SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.D. TULZAPURKAR AND A. VARADARAJAN, JJ.
H.C. Sharma and others, Petitioners
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others, Respondents.
Writ Petn. No. 221 of 1979,
D/-13-7-1983.
SENIORITY AND PROMOTIONS
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 32 - Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 487 - Posts of Junior Engineers - Direct recruitment - Seniority list - Petitioners in W. P. 221 of 1979 (Diploma-holders Junior Engineers) is that they are holding posts of Junior Engineers in service of respondent 1 for 16 to 18 years having joined service as Junior Engineers during while respondents 3 to 46 are those who have been directly recruited as Assistant Engineers during in contravention of declared policy of Government barring direct recruitment - Next promotional posts to the petitioners are Assistant Engineers - First respondent has been resorting to direct recruitment to posts of Assistant Engineers to extent of 50 per cent resulting in stagnation of petitioners in grade of Junior Engineers - First respondent has taken a decision by Resolutions Nos. 416 and 78 dated to effect that all fundamental rules and supplementary rules including amendments and orders issued by Central Government shall be treated as rules etc. of first respondent-Corporation - Similarly, Central Services Conduct Rules as applicable to Central Government and general fundamental rules including amendments and orders issued by the Central Government have been made applicable to first respondent-Corporation - As soon as petitioners learnt that there is suspension of direct recruitment in CPWD petitioners invited attention of first respondent to that fact and requested for banning of direct recruitment of Assistant Engineers and were given an assurance that their rights will not be overlooked –Held, contention of respondent 1 in its counter-affidavit is that names of Junior Engineers working as Assistant Engineers on Current Duty Charge and Ad hoc basis are not mentioned in that seniority list as they are only Junior Engineers who have not been regularly appointed as Assistant Engineers - It is not case of petitioners in Writ Petition that their seniority as Junior Engineers has not been fixed properly - They are only Junior Engineers and consequently they cannot question correctness of seniority list dated relating to Assistant Engineers - This cannot be done except by carving out two classes in same category of Junior Engineers on basis merely of their qualification which is not permissible in law though creation of selection grade in same category on the basis of merit and or seniority is well-known and permissible - Petitioners Graduate Junior Engineers in the service of respondent 1 are entitled to be put on par with their counterparts in other Government departments, and prayer No. 7 is to direct respondent 1 to grant revised pay scale of Rs. 550-900/- to the petitioners in Writ Petition and other Graduate Junior Engineers as in case of Graduate Junior Engineers in Class III service in other Government departments - Scale of Rs. is of selection grade of Junior Engineers - There are 13 selection grade posts in Engineering Service (Civil) of respondent 1 - Court think that petitioners are not entitled to these two reliefs also - Result is that Writ Petition 221 of 1979 fails and is dismissed
Judgment
VARADARAJAN, J.:- The petitioners in these two writ petitions, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, are Junior Engineers of the first respondent, Municipal Corporation of Delhi. W. P. No. 221 of 1979 has been filed by Diploma-holders amongst the Junior Engineers for the issue of writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ to :
(1) Restrain respondent 1 from recruiting Assistant Engineers directly and filling up the posts of Assistant Engineers;
(2) Direct respondent 1 to give effect to the recommendations of the Third Pay Commission regarding the rules and policy of promotion etc.;
(3) Quash the seniority list (Annexure G) prepared by respondent 1;
(4) Direct respondent 1 to reckon the seniority of the petitioners with their length of service; and
(5) Direct respondent 1 not to affect in any manner all those holding ad hoc charge and current duty charge.
W. P. No. 1194 of 1979 has been filed by Graduate junior Engineers as well as Graduate Junior Engineers selected for appointment directly as Assistant Engineers for the issue of a writ of mandamus, certiorari or any other appropriate writ to :
(1) Direct respondent 1 to fill up eight posts of Assistant Engineers amongst those in the Select Panel;
(2) Quash Office Order dated 10-4-1978 (Annexure I) entrusting Junior Engineers with current duty charge of the posts of Assistant Engineers and the Office Order dated 21-6-1979 (Annexure M) promoting two Junior Engineers as Assistant Engineers on current duty charge on their own pay scale;
(3) Direct respondent 1 to fill up the remaining posts of Assistant Engineers in the direct recruitment quota from amongst the empanelled petitioners who are Graduate Junior Engineers;
(4) Declare the petitioners - Graduate Junior Engineers as a separate category and give them equal quota under the departmental promotee quota in the posts of Assistant Engineers;
(5) Restrain respondent 1 from giving ad hoc promotions to current duty chargholders amongst Junior Engineers;
(6) Declare that the petitioners Graduate Junior Engineers in the service of respondent 1 are entitled to be put on par with their counter-parts in other Government departments;
(7) Direct respondent 1 to grant revised pay scales of Rs. 555-900 to the petitioners and other Graduate Junior Engineers as in the case of Graduate Engineers in Class III service In other Government departments with effect from the date it is made applicable in the Central Public Works Department in view of the decision in Ram Kumar v. Union of India; and
(8) Direct respondent 1 to revise special pay from Rs. 40/- to Rs. 75/- per mensem to the petitioners and other Graduate Junior Engineers entitled thereto from 1-1-1979.
2. The case of the petitioners in W. P. 221 of 1979 (Diploma-holders Junior Engineers) is that they are holding the posts of Junior Engineers in the service of respondent 1 for 16 to 18 years having joined service as Junior Engineers during 1967 to 1970 while respondents 3 to 46 are those who have been directly recruited as Assistant Engineers during 1974-78 in contravention of the declared policy of the Government barring direct recruitment. The next promotional posts to the petitioners are Assistant Engineers. The first respondent has been resorting to direct recruitment to the posts of Assistant Engineers to the extent of 50 per cent resulting in stagnation of the petitioners in the grade of Junior Engineers. It has been following the pattern of functioning current in the Central Public Works Department, hereinafter referred to as 'CPWD' in all matters of recruitment, promotion and other conditions of service. The CPWD had decided to suspend direct recruitment to the Central Engineering Service because no promotional chances were available to the Central Engineering/Electrical Engineering Service (Class II). That decision taken in August, 1975 became effective from 1-4-1972 (Annexure 'B'). The first respondent has taken a decision by Resolutions Nos. 416 and 78 dated 27-7-1970 and 21-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.