SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 138

D.A.DESAI, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Azad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Barkatullah Khan – Respondent


Advocates:
K.L.Hathi, O.P.Varma, P.C.KAPUR, R.S.Mehta, S.Baggar, S.N.Singh, S.RANGARAJAN, Uma Jain

Judgment

DESAI, J.:- These two appeals by special leave arise from two suits filed by Barkatullah and Shafiullah for possession of land more particularly set out at the foot of the plaint against the Zamindars and Prem Kumari and Noor Mohammad. Briefly stated the plaintiffs case was that they were Thekedars and the Theka was taken for personally cultivating the land and therefore under Section 12 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (1950 Act for short), they have become hereditary tenants and they were in possession of land on 1st April, 1950. It was alleged that the Zamindars had no right to lease the land after the plaintiffs became hereditary tenants yet Prem Kumari and Noor Mohammad took land on lease from Zamindars and entered possession after 1-4-1950. It was alleged that the lessees from the Zamindar had no right to remain in possession as against hereditary tenants. On this short ground the plaintiffs sought possession of the land.

2. The defendants were the Zamindars and the two lessees who contested the suit. The averments made in para 4 of the plaint were not controverted specifically and it was merely stated that they are subject to additional plea



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top