1983 Supreme(SC) 291
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A. DESAI AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
A.P. Scheduled Tribes Co-operative Finance Dev. Corporation, Appellant
Versus
B. Pundiah and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 1145 of 1971, D/- 20-9-1983.
B.PARTHASARTHY, BABY KRISHNAN, G.N.Rao, P.GOVINDAN NAYAR, T.V.S.N.Chari
Headnote:
Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act - Special Rules - Rule 2 - Economic exploitation - Tribals living - Corporation by Government from time to time and it appears that ultimately it came to be realised that unless all minor forest produce units were leased to the Corporation on a monopoly basis, exploitation of tribals by tradesmen would not cease - As a result of this realisation Government of Andhra Pradesh decided to grant lease of minor forest produce leaseunits to Corporation on a monopoly basis - So, by G. O. No. 142 dated Government purported to grant lease of minor forest produce leaseunits in Godavari lower division for a period of six years but in actual terms G. O. only authorised Corporation to collect seigniorage from purchasers of minor forest produce on all items collected by Agency tribes from unreserves of Rampa Agency - Corporation preferred an appeal to High Court - A learned single Judge allowed appeal but his judgment was reversed by a Division Bench under clause 15 of Letters Patent - Division Bench found that under Rule 2 of Special Rules for management of reserved and unreserved lands in Rampa Agency of East Godavari District all the permanent residents of Rampa Agency were empowered to gather minor forest, produce throughout said area, free of charge and without permits and that it followed therefrom that persons who gathered produce were entitled to deal with it as owners – Held, effect of judgment of Division Bench has now been nullified by provisions of Andhra Pradesh Regulation 1 of 1979 made by Governor of Andhra Pradesh under paragraph 5 (2) of Fifth Schedule to Constitution - In interregnum between date of Judgment of Division Bench of the High Court and date of commencement of Regulation, there was in operation an order of stay granted by this Court and this enabled Corporation to exploit lease of minor forest produce on a monopoly basis - Court do not have slightest doubt that effect of the various provisions of Regulation is to create a State monopoly in matter of trade in minor forest produce in Scheduled Areas through the agency of Corporation - Corporation alone may buy minor forest produce and no one else - No one can now claim a right to sell the minor forest produce collected by him to whomsoever he likes and no one other than Corporation may buy such minor forest produce - Therefore both declaration and injunction granted by Division Bench of High Court must be vacated - Appeal is allowed accordingly.
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:-- The economic exploitation of the tribals living in the Rampachodavaram and other Agency areas in Andhra Pradesh by tradesmen coming from the plains is a notorious fact of recent history. One of the measures taken by the Government of Andhra Pradesh to stem the exploitation of tribals and to promote their economic interests and social welfare, was to establish a Corporation known as the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Tribes Co-operative Finance and Development Corporation Ltd., a society registered under the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act. Amongst the objects of the Corporation were :
"(1) to purchase outright the produce brought by the members of the scheduled tribes through the Agency of any primary marketing society, hereinafter referred to as Affiliated Societies". and market it to the best advantage and for this purpose to take up forest confess" of bamboo coupes, fuel and for procurement of minor forest produce from the Govt., (2) to supply the requirements of the members of the scheduled tribes through the agency of the affiliated Societies by making bulk purchases; (3) to co-ordinate, supervise and control the activities of the affiliated societies, (4) to undertake activities such as processing and grading for the benefit of the Corporation and its affiliated Societies and their members, and for this purpose to own or hire the necessary plants and machinery : (5) to own or hire and ply lorries on hire for the transport of its goods and those of its affiliated societies, their members and others; (6) discharge prior debts of the members of Scheduled Tribes; and (7) to undertake generally such other activities as are conducive to the promotion of the economic interests and social welfare of the members of the scheduled tribes and the attainment of these and other objectives."
2. Several minor forest produce lease units were leased to the Corporation by the Government from time to time and it appears that ultimately it came to be realised that unless all the minor forest produce units were leased to the Corporation on a monopoly basis, exploitation of tribals by tradesmen would not cease. As a result of this realisation the Government of Andhra Pradesh decided to grant lease of minor forest produce leaseunits to the Corporation on a monopoly basis. So, by G. O. No. 142 dated 23rd January 1962 the Government purported to grant lease of the minor forest produce leaseunits in the Godavari lower division for a period of six years but in actual terms the G. O. only authorised the Corporation to collect seigniorage from the purchasers of minor forest produce on all items collected by the Agency tribes from the unreserves of Rampa Agency. The tradesmen moved quickly in the matter. Four persons, two of then professing to be tribals residing in the Rampa Agency and two non-tribals belonging to the plains, filed O. S. No. 4 of 1962 in the Court of the Agent of Government of Andhra Pradesh, at Kakinada,
"(a) for a declaration that the leasehold granted by the State Government to the 1st defendant consists of a "mere right to collect seigniorage" from the purchasers of the minor forest produce in the unreserves of the Rama Agency and that the tribals in the Rama Agency have a right to sell the minor forest produce in the unreserves of the Rama Agency at the notified shandies to whomsoever they liked and that the purchasers are entitled to remove the minor forest produce so purchased on payment of seigniorage to the defendants, and
(b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their offiecials from in any manner interfering with the plaintiffs exercise and enjoyment of the rights declared under clause (a) supra :"
Though Plaintiffs 1 and 2 professed to be tribals, it is easy to see that they were mere stooges of non-tribal tradesmen.
3. The suit was decreed on 10th March 1964 by the District Judge of East Godavari. The Government realised the mistake committed by them in authorising the c