SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 350

A.P.SEN, D.P.MADAN
Charanji Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SEN, J. — This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and sentence of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated March 3, 1982 by which the High Court has set aside the order of acquittal recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Moga dated March 14, 1980 and convicted the appellant under Sec. 7 read with Section 16(l)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (Act for short) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, and in default, rigorous imprisonment for a further period of three months.

2. The questions in this appeal are, firstly, a question of law as to whether the word damaged appearing in the proviso to sub-section (2C) of S. 13 of the Act is susceptible of a wider construction as to include damage due to any cause including decomposition; and secondly a mixed question of fact and law, as to whether the kutcha khoya sold by the appellant was adulterated i.e. not of the nature, substance or quality prescribed by law.

3. The relevant facts are these. The appellant runs a sweetmeat shop at Sadar Bazar, Moga, On January 3, 1978 Dr. Paramjit Singh, Medical Officer, R. D. Ra


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top