SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 329

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A. VARADARAJAN AND M.P. THAKKAR, JJ.
Krishna Priya Ganguly etc. etc, Appellants
Versus
University of Lucknow and others etc., Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 133-134, 137-140, 142-146, 595, 3045-3046 of 1982 with Civil Appeal No. 3047 of 1982
Decided on 7-10-1983.
WITH
The Principal, King Georges Medical College, Lucknow, U.P. and another, Appellants
Versus
Dr. Ved Parkash Gupta and others, Respondents.
Advocates appearing:
 Mr. S. N. Kacker, Sr. Advocate, Ms. S. Bhandare, Mr. T. Sridharan and Ms. C. K. Sudhariata, Mr. K. K. Jain, Mr. M. D. Sagar, Mr P. Dayal, Mr, Pankaj Kalra, Mr. R. P. Singh, Mr. V. A. Bobde, Mr. K. J. John, Mr. Altaf Ahmed, Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Ms. Vrinda, Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta, Mr. Brij Bhushan, Mr. Kapil Sibil, Ms. S. Dikshit, Mr. Sudhir Kulshrestha, Mr. B. R. Agarwala, Mr. R. H. Pancholi, Mr. Vijayalakshmi Menon and Mr. B. P. Singh.
* (1) W. P. Nos. 1834, 3946, 3825, 2953, 4163, 4177, 4234, 4319, 4320, 3591, 3775, 2952, and 1662 of 1981, D/- 14-10-1981 (All) (LB).
(2) W. P. Nos. 4245 of 1981, D/- 19-3-1982 (All) (LB).

Advocates:
Altaf Ahmed, ANIL GUPTA, B.P.SINGH, B.R.AGRAWAL, BRIJ BHUSHAN SHARMA, C.K.SUDHARITA, K.J.JOHN, K.K.JAIN, KAILASH VASUDEV, KAPIL SIBAL, M.D.SAGAR, P.Dayal, PANKAJ KAIRA, R.H.PANCHOLI, R.P.SINGH PAL, S.Bhandan, S.DIXIT, S.N.KACKAR, SUDHIR KULSHRESTHA, T.SHRIDHARN, V.A.BOBDE, VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON, Vrinda Dhar

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 14 - Indian Medical Council Act of 1956 - Section 33 - U. P. State Universities Act, 1973 - Section 28, (5) - Medical education - Serious health hazard - Government had to face a serious problem with coming up of medical colleges which started growing like mushrooms and were charging huge capitation fees to make substantial profits without providing proper medical education and caring precious little for achieving excellence of standards in medical education which, if denuded of such standards, would pose a serious health hazard to people - Surely, Court would not wish that people who could ill-afford to go in for well equipped expensive medical practitioners should be thrown at mercy of quacks - Similar situation arose in technical, engineering and other kinds of institutions but we would concentrate on feature and facets of medical education which alone forms subject-matter of these appeals - However, in order to meet contingency resulting from a heavy rush for admissions institutions set up certain standards or tests which had to be complied with before candidates could be admitted - Here also, as in other spheres, favouritism and nepotism have their own role to play as a result of which merits suffer – Held, High Court could not devise its own criterion for admission - Since academic body has made marks obtained in MBBS examination criterion, admission had to be made by such a criterion - High Court could not have introduced its own notions in such an academic matter - High Court was not competent to do so and had no jurisdiction to import its own ideology - Court do not see any proper material for this conclusion to which High Court has suddenly jumped apart from fact that admissions were not to be given by High Court according to its own notions - Finally, in his own petition in High Court, respondent, had merely prayed for a writ directing State or college to consider his case for admission yet High Court went a step further and straightway issued a writ of mandamus directing college to admit him to M. S. course and thus granted a relief to respondent which he himself never prayed for and could not have prayed for - Such a gross discrimination made in case of a person who had obtained lowest aggregate and lowest position seems to Court to be extremely shocking - Court allow this appeal and set aside judgment of High Court issuing mandamus to State to admit respondent to M. S. course - His writ petition in High Court thus stands dismissed.

JUDGMENT

FAZAL ALI, J. :—Soon after our hardwon freedom there was a gradual rise in the urban population in view of the process of industrialisation and setting up of heavy projects and industries in order to make out country more and more self-sufficient. This led to a certain spurt and rise in the urban population as people from the rural areas started pouring into the urban cities which provided far better opportunities for education and employment than the rural areas. This sudden increase in urban population led to the spread of epidemics and diseases resulting in a rapid growth of educational institutions both in the public and private sectors.

2. In these appeals, we are concerned only with the medical education; the Government had to face a serious problem with the coming up of medical colleges which started growing like mushrooms and were charging huge capitation fees to make substantial profits without providing proper medical education and caring precious little for achieving excellence of standards in medical education which, if denuded of such standards, would pose a serious health hazard to the people. Surely, We would not wish that people who could ill-afford to go in for well equipped expensive medical practitioners should be thrown at the mercy of quacks. Similar situation arose in technical, engineering and other kinds of institutions but we would concentrate on the feature and facets of medical education which alone forms the subject-matter of these appeals. We have seen from our experience that each year there is a huge rush for admission to seats in medical colleges for various courses, which being rather few and insufficient to control or absorb all sorts and kinds of candidates as the well-known Persian proverb "JAYE TANG AST WA MARDUMA BISYAR" (i. e. little space and people many) seems aptly to apply in such a situation. However, in order to meet the contingency resulting from a heavy rush for admissions the institutions set up certain standards or tests which had to be complied with before candidates could be admitted. Here also, as in other spheres, favouritism and nepotism have their own role to play as a result of which merits suffer. In order to meet these contingencies and ward off such evils, the Government through its circulars and the Medical Council of India being alive to this delicate and difficult problem sought to solve the problem by making rules and regulations for admission of candidates to various courses in different disciplines (subjects) to achieve excellence in medical standards keeping in view statutory and constitutional reservations. Unfortunately, however, these rules were often flouted and observed more in breach than in compliance by those who were in charge of the medical education: the result was again a huge spurt of writ petitions in the High Court to weed out the inefficient and ineligible and absorb the efficient and eligible.

3. With this short prelude, now to the facts of the case which disclose a sad story indeed - not because those in charge of the institutions commit errors but because the Courts start directing the authorities to grant provisional admissions to students even if they did not deserve the same in some cases. Experience has shown that in view of the huge accumulation of arrears in Courts, it takes a long time for the petitions to be disposed of, hence we have evolved the practice of forcing the authorities to grant provisional admissions which has resulted in a piquant and pungent situation because by the time the case comes up for hearing, the rejected candidates having completed their course and having appeared at the examination with every hope of success become eligible for admission to the higher course in case of success though the Court may ultimately find that their initial rejection was justified. Such a situation becomes a sort of a fait accompli for those in charge of the institutions as a result of which the candidates are admitted in due de





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top