SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 368

A.N.SEN, D.A.DESAI
Gopinath Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

DESAI, J.:— Special leave granted.

2. Appellant Gopinath Ghosh was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nadia along with Bharat Ghosh @ Sadhu and Jagannath Ghosh under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for having committed murder of Rabi Ghosh, son of Kartick Ghosh on August 19, 1974. Appellant Gopinath Ghosh is alleged to have caused an injury with a fala which landed on the left side chest below the neck of deceased Rabi. Information of the offence was lodged by Kartick Ghosh, father of deceased Rabi at Nakashipara Police Station at about 3.40 p.m. on the date of the occurrence. After completing the investigation, appellant and two others were chargesheeted for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Session. The case came up for trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nadia who on appraisal of evidence held that appellant Gopinath Ghosh has caused the fatal injury in furtherance of the common intention of all the three accused and accordingly convicted them for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top