SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 390

R.S.PATHAK, A.N.SEN
Hoshie Shavaksha Dolikuka – Appellant
Versus
Thrity Hoshie Dolikuka – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.AGRAWAL, M.P.SHROFF, V.S.DESAI

ORDER:—We have heard the petitioner in person and Shri V. S. Desai for the respondent on this review application. The petitioner has vehemently contended that it is no longer in the interests of the child, Gospi, to continue her in the boarding institution, Kimmins High School, Panchgani, and he has attempted to show by reference to documentary material that it would make the happiness and welfare of the child if she were put to school in Bombay. It appears to us on careful consideration that while the respondent has uniformly attempted to encourage the child to settle down in the Kimmins High School and to improve her standard of scholastic and extra-curricular activities. The petitioner, on the contrary, has made no effort in that regard. In fact, we get the impression that during his visits to child in school and in the period spends her holidays with him a sense of dissatisfaction with the school is created in the childs mind with result that the child suffers from an antipathy towards the institution and is unable to concentrate on her studies. We enquired from the petitioner whether besides visiting the child he ever wrote to her even as the respondent did. We find that he do



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top