SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 34

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. BHAGWATI, R.S. PATHAK AND AMARENDRA NATH SEN, JJ.
Lakshmi Kant Pandey, Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Respondent.
Writ. Petn. (Crl.) No. 1171 of 1982
Decided on 6-2-1984.

Advocates:
A.Subhashini, B.M.BAGARIA, Baldev Raj Chadha, G.M.COELHO, J.B.DADACHAN, KAILASH VASUDEV, KAMINI JAISWAL, MANIK KARANJAVALA, N.M.GHATATE, P.H.Parekh, P.K.CHAKRAVARTI, PARIJAT SINHA, RANI JETHMALANI, S.K.MEHTA, SUKUMAR GHOSH, URMILA KAPUR

Headnote:(i) Criminal writ petition alleging mal-practices in inter-country adoptions - Petitioner filed criminal writ petition in the Supreme Court complaining of malpractices indulged in by social organizations and voluntary agencies engaged in the work of offering Indian Children in adoption to foreign parents-Court up holds adoption to foreign parents in the absence of suitable Indian adoptive parents-Court also provides for guidelines to regulate such adoptions-Court relies upon Declaration of the Rights of the Child* and the Draft Guidelines of Procedures concerning Inter-country Adoption to formulate guidelines. **

       (ii) Foreigner wishes to adopt destitute Indian child-Requirements to be fulfilled by the foreigner.

       Held in the first place, every application from a foreigner desiring to adopt a child must be sponsored by a social or child welfare agency recognized by the government of the country in which the foreigner is resident. No application by a foreigner for taking a child in adoption should be entertained directly by any social or welfare agency in India working in the area of inter-country adoption or by any institution or centre or home to which children are committed by juvenile court.

       Further held this is essential to reduce profiteering and trafficking in children. Secondly it will provide the Courts with a proper home study report on which to base its decision. Thirdly the intervention of the child welfare agency will provide a body in the country of the foreigner who could be responsible for supervising the progress of the child.

       Also held the social or child welfare agency sponsoring the applications of the foreigner must append a home study report prepared by a professional worker indicating the basis on which the application is being sponsored. Along with the home study a recent photograph of the adoptive family, a marriage certificate of the foreigner, certificate regarding health duly certified by medical doctor, declaration regarding their financial status alongwith supporting documents must be attached. The foreigner must also attach a declaration stating that they are willing to be appointed as guardians of the child and will adopt the child according to the law of their country within 2 years pf the childs arrival in their country.

       Further required the foreigner will send progress report of child alongwith recent photograph to the concerned court and welfare agency for five years.

       (iii) Safeguards required to be fulfilled when biological parents give in adoption.

       Held it should be regarded as an elementary requirement that biological parents should be properly assisted in making a decision about relinquishing a child for adoption. They should understand all the possibilities of adoption including the possibility of adoption by a foreigner.

       Further held once the decision is taken and not reconsidered within such further time as may be allowed to them, it must be regarded as irrevocable and the procedure for giving the child in adoption to a foreigner can then be initiated without any further reference to the biological parents.

       Also held in order to eliminate any possibility of mischief and to make sure that the child has in fact been surrendered by its biological parents; it is necessary that the institution to which the child is surrendered take document of surrender from the biological parents.

       (iv) Application from foreigner for adoption of Indian child.

       Question

       Which, body should process this application in India?

       Held the application should be processed only through a social or child welfare agency licensed or recognized by the Government of India or the Government of the State in which it is operating.

       Further held before taking a decision to recognize any particular social or child welfare agency for the purpose of inter-country adoptions the concerned Government would do well to examine whether the agency has proper staff with professional social work experience to carry out the highly responsible task of ensuring proper placement of a child with a foreign adoptive family. Further an agency which is engaged in the work of child care and welfare should be considered for recognition, since inter-country adoption must be looked upon not as an independent activity but part of the child welfare programme.

       (v) Factors to be taken note of by child welfare Agency before it forwards the case of a particular child for intercountry adoption.

       Held the recognized social or child welfare agency should on receiving an application of a foreigner consider which child would be suitable for giving in adoption to the foreigner and would fit into the environment of his family and community and send the photograph and child study report of such child to the foreigner for obtaining his approval.

       Further held the practice of accepting a general approval of the foreigner to adopt any child should not be allowed as if the foreigner does not like the specific child on arrival the interests of the child would be prejudiced. The agency must therefore insist on the approval of a specific known child and once that approval is obtained the agency should immediately move an application for appointment of the foreigner as guardian of the child.

       (vi) Guardians and Wards Act 1890, Section 11 - Application under Section 11 of the Act asking that a foreigner be appointed the guardian of an Indian Child.

       Question

       What procedure should be followed by the Court?

       Held even though Section It of the Act allows for notice of application to the parents of the child. The court is of the opinion that no notice should be issued to the biological parents of the child.

       However held the court, should, before entertaining an application for guardianship give notice to the Indian Council of Child Welfare or the Indian Council of Social Welfare or to any of its branches for scrutiny of application with a view to ensure that it will be for the benefit of the child to be given in adoption to the foreigner seeking the application for guardianship.

JUDGMENT

BHAGWATI, J. :— This writ petition has been initiated on the basis of a letter addressed by one Laxmi Kant Pandey, an advocate practising in this Court, complaining of malpractices indulged in by social organisations and voluntary agencies engaged in the work of offering Indian children in adoption to foreign parents. The letter referred to a press report based on "empirical investigation carried out by the staff of a reputed foreign magazine" called "The Mail" and alleged that not only Indian children of tender age are under the guise of adoption "exposed to the long horrendous journey to distant foreign countries at great risk to their lives but in cases where they survive and where these children are not placed in the Shelter and Relief Homes, they in course of time become beggars or prostitutes for want of proper care from their alleged foreign foster parents". The petitioner accordingly sought relief restraining Indian based private agencies "from carrying out further activity of routing children for adption abroad" and directing the Government of India, the Indian Council of Child Welfare and the Indian Council of Social Welfare to carry out their obligations in the matter of adoption of Indian children by foreign parents. This letter was treated as a writ petition and by an Order dated 1st Sept., 1982 the Court issued notice to the Union of India, the Indian Council of Child Welfare and the Indian Council of Social Welfare to appear in answer to the writ petition and assist the Court in laying down principles and norms which should be followed in determining whether a child should be allowed to be adopted by foreign parents and if so, the procedure to be followed for that purpose with the object of ensuring the welfare of the child.

2. The Indian Council of Social Welfare was the first to file its written submissions in response to the notice issued by the Court and its written submission filed on 30th Sept., 1982 not only carried considerable useful material bearing on the question of adoption of Indian children by foreign parents but also contained various suggestions and recommendations for consideration by the Court in formulating principles and norms for permitting such adoptions and laying down the procedure for that purpose. We shall have occasion to refer to this large material placed before us as also to discuss the various suggestions and recommendations made in the written submission by the Indian Council of Social Welfare when we take up for consideration the various issues arising in the writ petition. Suffice it to state for the present that the written submission of the Indian Council of Social Welfare is a well thought out document dealing comprehensively with various aspects of the problem in its mani-fold dimensions. When the writ petition reached hearing before the Court on 12th October, 1982 the only written submission filed was that of the Indian Council of Social Welfare and neither the Union of India nor the Indian Council of Child Welfare had made any response to the notice issued by the Court. But there was a telegram received from a Swedish Organisation called "Barnen Framfoer Allt Adoptioner" intimating to the Court that this Organisation desired to participate in the hearing of the writ petition and to present proper material before the Court. S. O. S. Childrens Villages of India also appeared through their counsel Mrs. Urmila Kapoor and applied for being allowed to intervene at the hearing of the writ petition so that they could make their submissions on the question of adoption of Indian children by foreign parents. Since S. O. S. Childrens Villages of India is admittedly an organisation concerned with welfare of children, the Court, by an Order dated 12th. October 1982, allowed them to intervene and to make their submissions before the Court. The Court also by the same order directed that the Registry may address a communication to Barnen Framfoer Allt Adoptioner informing them abo














































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top