SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 18

RANGANATH MISRA, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A.V.VARADARAJAN
Avtar Singh Brar – Appellant
Versus
Tej Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.PUNDIR, A.S.Sohal, ASHOK SHARMA, K.L.SHARMA, M.C.DHINGRA, M.VIRAPPA

JUDGMENT

FAZAL ALI, J. :— This election appeal arises out of an election to the Baghapurana Constituency (District Faridkot) to the Punjab Legislative Assembly. The polling took place on May 31, 1980 and the counting was done on June 1, 1980. Tej Singh, respondent, secured 25694 votes whereas Avtar Singh (appellant) secured 25571 votes. There were three other candidates also in the field, viz. (1) Sathi Ruplal. (2) Bhagat Puran Singh, and (3) Jagdish Chander. Ruplal secured 1347 votes while Bhagat Puran Singh and Jagdish Chander secured 140 and 2856 votes respectively. It appears that the margin between the votes secured by Tej Singh (respondent) and Avtar Singh (appellant) was only 123.

2. Avtar Singh filed an election petition in the Punjab and Haryana High Court against Tej Singh alleging that he was guilty of committing corrupt practices, detailed in the petition and in the statement of facts. Ruplal supported the appellant but Bhagat Puran Singh and Jagdish did not put in any appearance despite service and, therefore, the proceedings were taken ex parte against them. Tej Singh denied having indulged in any corrupt practice as alleged by Avtar Singh.

3. It is not necessary for us











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top