SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 47

A.V.VARADARAJAN, RANGANATH MISRA, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Vivekanand Giri – Appellant
Versus
Nawal Kishore Sahi – Respondent


Advocates:
A.M.SANGHVI, A.SHARAN, D.P.MUKHERJI, D.P.Singh, K.N.Rai, L.M.SINGHVI, L.R.SINGH, SALMAN KHURSHID

JUDGMENT

VARADARAJAN, J.:— This appeal under Section 116 (A) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, hereinafter referred to as the Act arises out of the judgment of a learned single Judge of the Patna High Court in Election Petition No. 27 of 1980, setting aside the appellants election to the Bihar Legislative Assembly from No. 64, Rui Saidpur constituency on the ground that the election is void on account of improper rejection of the nomination papers of one Ram Kumar Jha. The election petition was filed by the first respondent, Nawal Kishore Sahi, the defeated candidate. The election was held on 31-5-1980 and the results were announced on 1-6-1980 after the counting. The appellant who contested as the Congress (I) candidate secured 38,463 votes while the respondent who contested as the Janata Party candidate secured 26,991 votes. The other candidates secured much less and the appellant who secured a majority of 11,472 votes over the respondent was declared elected by the Returning Officer. After having heard the learned counsel for the parties we dismissed the appeal without costs on 8-2-1984 for reasons to follow. Now we proceed to give the reasons.

2. The respondent pres








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top