SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 40

A.P.SEN, D.A.DESAI, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
Abdul Jalil – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

TULZAPURKAR, J. :— Brief reasons for the dismissal of these writ petitions are :

1. This is a second attempt on the part of Sunni Muslims of Varanasi substantially to have our main decision rendered in Writ Petition No. 4675 of 1978 on November 3, 1981 reviewed, the first attempt having failed as a result of the dismissal of Writ Petitions Nos. 9014-16 of 1983 on 23rd September, 1983; the second attempt in the same direction has also to fail.

2. Apart from challenging the main decision, the petitioners are aggrieved by our direction to shift the two graves from existing position to the south of the grave of Maulana Hakim Badruddin, a direction contained in our order dated 23rd September, 1983 in C. M. P. No. 4939 of 1983. Here also, it must be stated that it was after giving a full hearing on the point to the Sunni Muslims on whose behalf writ petitions Nos. 9014-16 of 1983 were filed that the direction of shifting of the graves was given and hence that direction also cannot be made a subject-matter of a review by means of the present writ petitions.

3. Even on merits no case has been made out for admitting these writ petitions. The main contentions of the petitioners as urge






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top