S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, RANGANATH MISRA, A.V.VARADARAJAN
Punjab University, Chandigarh: Punjab University – Appellant
Versus
Sunder Singh: Ajai Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
RANGANATH MISRA, J .— Each of these appeals is by special leave and is directed against the decision of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in separate writ petitions. A common question is involved in all the three matters and that relates to a correct interpretation of Rule 27.1 (a) in Chapter III of the Punjab University Regulations.
2. Respondents in each of these appeals was a student of the Punjab University for the Master Degree in Law (LL M.). Rule 7 of the Punjab University Regulations provides :-
"7. The minimum marks required to pass Part I/II examination, as the case may be, shall be :
(i) 45 per cent in each paper, and
(ii) 50 per cent in the aggregate."
It may be stated that there are eight papers in all each carrying 100 marks and Part-I covers four papers while, Part-II covers the remainder. Rule 27 reads as follows :
"27.1 (a) A candidate who appears in all subjects of an examination and who fails in one or more subjects (written, practical, sessional or viva voce) and / or the aggregate (if there is a separate requirement of passing on the aggregate shall be given grace marks up to maximum of 1 per cent of the total aggregate marks (excluding marks for internal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.