SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 104

D.A.DESAI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, R.S.PATHAK, A.P.SEN, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
R. S. Nayak: P. S. Samant – Appellant
Versus
A. R. Antulay – Respondent


JUDGMENT

DESAI, J.:—Consequent upon the order made by a Constitution Bench of this Court on February 16, 1984 in the Judgment rendered in Criminal Appeal No.356 of 1983 and Transferred Case No. 347 of 1983 along with Transferred Case No. 348 of 1983, Special Case No. 24 of 1982 and Special Case No. 3/83 pending in the Court of the Special Judge, Greater Bombay (Shri R. B. Sule) were withdrawn and stood transferred to the High Court of Bombay. In compliance with the direction given in the same judgment, the learned Chief Justice of the High Court of Bombay assigned both the cases to Mr. Justice S. N. Khatri, a sitting Judge of the High Court. The learned Judge called upon the parties to appear before him on March 12, 1984. When the cases were taken up for hearing, certain preliminary objections were raised on behalf of the accused which we were told have been dealt with by the learned Judge in his order dated March 16, 1984. In respect of two issues further consideration was postponed. These issues turn upon the question of procedure to be adopted by the learned Judge in the trial of the two cases and who should be in charge of the prosecution. In our opinion, if the judgment of thi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top