SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 94

A.P.SEN, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Biharichowdhary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.SINGH, D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, L.N.Sinha, RANJIT GHOSAL, RAVI PRAKASH GUPTA

JUDGMENT

BALAKRISHNA ERADI, J..— The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave concerns the true scope and application of Section 80 of the CiviI Procedure Code.

2. The appellants herein are the plaintiffs in a suit instituted in the Munsiffs Court, Bihar Sharif, seeking the reliefs of declaration of title and delivery of possession with mesne profits in respect of the properties described in the plaint. The State of Bihar - the 1st, respondent herein - is the main defendant in the suit. Prior to the institution of the suit, the plaintiffs had issued a notice to the 1st respondent - State- under Section 80 C. P. C. on 18-2-1969 and Exhibit 2 is a copy of the said notice. However, without waiting for the statutory period of two months, the plaintiffs instituted the suit on 2-4-1969. In the written statement filed on behalf of the State of Bihar, it was contended, inter alia, that the suit was not maintainable for want of proper notice under Section 80 C. P. C. This contention was upheld by the trial Court which also recorded findings against the plaintiffs on the remaining issues concerning the title to the property and their entitlement to reliefs



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top