SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 123

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Bidhubhushan Malik – Respondent


Advocates:
K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, R.D.AGRAWAL, R.N.Poddar

JUDGMENT

ORDER:—The Allahabad High Court has held :

"...........The High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954, (as amended) shall be read down as under : In para 10 of the First Schedule, the words "and who has retired on or after the 1st day of October, 1974" are unconstitutional and are struck down. Omitting the unconstitutional part it is declared that the Judges (including the Chief Justices) of the High Courts are entitled to pension as computed under the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954, (as amended) irrespective of the date of retirement. The date October 1, 1974, continues to be relevant as being one from which the liberalised pension became operative under the High Court Judges (Condition of Service) (Amendment) Act, 1976, irrespective of the date of retirement and hence there is no question of payment of arrears of pension for the period preceding October 1, 1974 ................."

For the reasons mentioned by the learned Judges of the Allahabad High Court in their Judgment, we agree with their conclusion and dismiss the special leave petition.

Petition dismissed.

For Citation: AIR 1984 SC 1177

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top