D.P.MADAN, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Mahindra And Mahindra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
TULZAPURKAR, J. :— This appeal by special leave raises the question whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the recommendation of a statutory body (Specified Authority under Section 72-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961) and the Central Governments decision based on it - a matter of subjective satisfaction - were open to judicial review and whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the same ?
2. The facts giving rise to the aforesaid question may he stated : Mahindra and Mahindra Limited (for short M and M) was incorporated under he Indian Companies Act 1913 and is thus duly registered under the Companies Act. 1956 : its share capital has been widely held. the principal shareholders being the public financial institutions to the extent of about 40 per cent of its equity share capital; it is engaged in the manufacture inter alia of jeeps and other motor vehicles on a large scale.
3. M/s. International Tractor Company of India Limited (for short ITCI) was incorporated on April 13, 1963 under the Companies Act, 1956 as a public company and was carrying on the business of manufacture and safe of agricultural tractors and implements which are an essent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.