SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 234

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P. SEN, E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND R.B. MISRA, J.
Ram Narayan Agarwal etc. etc., Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and others, Respondents.
Writ Petns. Nos. 1110, 2035, 4759, 6431 of 1980, 92, 140, 152, 400, 421, 497, 1366, 4719, 6931, 8054-58, 7483, 8458 of 1981, 871-873, 2362, 2621-22, 4053 and 5695 of 1982
Decided on 23-8-1983.

Advocates:
Anil B.Divan, B.DUTTA, B.P.MAHESHVARI, E.C.AGARWAL, GOPAL SUBRAMANIUM, M.MUDGAL, MIRA AGRAWAL, R.K.MEHTA, R.SATISH, RAMESH MEHROTRA, RANI CHHABRA, S.K.Bagga, Udaipratap Singh, Uma Jain, VIJAY PANDIT, Y.S.Chitale

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14, 19 (1) (d) and 21 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 51 - U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - S. 279 (1) (b) read with Section 281 - U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Section 33 - Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 - U. P. Sales Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 50 - U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rules 247 to 253 - Default in payment of tax - Arrest and detention - It is alleged that petitioners had, committed default in payment of tax payable by them under U. P. Sales Tax Act and warrants of arrest had either been issued or were about to be issued by concerned Revenue Officers for arrest and detention of petitioners in course of recovery proceedings - Any tax or other dues payable to State Government under that Act or any amount or money which a person is required to pay to assessing authority under sub-section (3) of Section thereof or for which he is personally liable to assessing authority under sub-section (6) of that section shall be recoverable as arrears of land revenue - Whether detention of defaulter would be productive of payment of arrear of a substantial portion thereof - Whether a restriction imposed by a statutory provision on fundamental right guaranteed is reasonable or not - Whether there is any justification for detaining him and it is only after he is satisfied that detention of defaulter will compel him to make payment of whole or a substantial part of arrear he can order his detention - Whether detention of defaulter would compel him to pay arrear or a substantial portion thereof, admittedly no such inquiry is held in any of these cases –Held, It follows that ordinarily defaulter would be made known that a certificate had been issued for recovery of arrears of land revenue from him - Having given our anxious consideration to question, Court are of view that provisions of S. 51 of Code of Civil Procedure would not in terms be applicable to process of the arrest and detention - Rules requires an enquiry to be held by officer who issued the warrant into question whether detention of defaulter would compel him to pay arrear or a substantial portion thereof, admittedly no such inquiry is held in any of these cases - Hence petitioners cannot be detained pursuant to any warrant of arrest already issued – Court have, therefore, to quash warrants which are already issued in these cases and direct that petitioners against whom such warrants have been issued should not be detained pursuant thereto – Court make an order accordingly - Order is made without prejudice to power of authorities concerned to realise arrears by arresting and detaining defaulters in accordance with law by passing fresh orders in light of above decision - Petitioners in some of these petitions have filed appeals or some other petitions against orders of assessment and that such appeals or petitions are still pending – Court do not express any opinion on merits of those appeals or other petitions - Petitions partly allowed.

JUDGMENT

VENKATARAMIAH, J.:— The common question which arises for consideration in all these petitions relates to the validity of the action taken by the authorities concerned against the petitioners for recovering the arrears of tax due and payable by them under the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 by the arrest and detention in civil prison of the petitioners in accordance with S. 279 (1) (b) read with Section 281 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the U. P. Z. A. & L. R. Act) and the Rules made thereunder.

2. It is alleged that the petitioners had, committed default in payment of the tax payable by them under the U. P. Sales Tax Act and warrants of arrest had either been issued or were about to be issued by the concerned Revenue Officers for the arrest and detention of the petitioners in the course of the recovery proceedings. Sub-section (8) of Section 8 of the U. P. Sales Tax, 1948 provides that any tax or other dues payable to the State Government under that Act or any amount or money which a person is required to pay to the assessing authority under sub-section (3) of Section thereof or for which he is personally liable to the assessing authority under sub-section (6) of that section shall be recoverable as arrears of land revenue Section 33 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 further provides that in respect of any sum recoverable under that Act as arrears of land revenue the assessing authority may forward to the Collector a certificate under his signature specifying the sum due. Such certificate is required to be treated as conclusive evidence of the existence of the liability, of its amount and of the person who is liable and the Collector on receipt of the certificate may proceed to recover from such person the amount specified therein as if it were an arrear of land revenue. It is further provided that without prejudice to the powers conferred by Section 33, the Collector shall, for the purposes of recovering the amount specified in the certificate, have also the power which a Collector has under the Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 and a Civil Court has under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for the purpose of recovery of an amount due under a decree. The Explanation to Section 33 provides that the expression Collector includes an Additional Collector or any other officer authorised to exercise the powers of a Collector under the law relating to land revenue for the time being in force in the State, Rule 50 of the U. P. Sales Tax Rules, 1948 provides that where a dealer or a person fails to deposit the tax or any other amount payable by him under the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 within the period fixed in that behalf, the same may be recovered as arrear of land revenue. Section 5 of the Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 (as in force in the State of Uttar Pradesh) reads :

"5. Recovery by Collector of sums recoverable as arrears of revenue on the certificates of public officers and local authorities - (1) Where any sum is recoverable as an arrear of land revenue by any public officer other than a Collector or by any local authority, such officer or authority may send to the Collector of the district in which the office of that officer or authority is situate or of any other district in Uttar Pradesh where the defaulter is or has property, a certificate in such form as may be prescribed by rules made in this behalf.

(2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the certificate shall be conclusive of matters therein stated.

(3) The Collector shall, on receipt of the certificate under sub-section (1), proceed to recover the amount stated therein as if the sum were payable to himself.

(4) The provisions of Section 4 shall have effect in relation to such certificate as if it. were a certificate sent under sub-section (1) of Section 3."

3. In the State of Uttar Pradesh the relevant provisions relating to the procedure for recovery of arrears of land revenue are to be found in Section 279 and other cog













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top