SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 144

A.N.SEN, D.A.DESAI, R.B.MISRA
Raj Rani – Appellant
Versus
Chief Settlement Commissioner, Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
B.C.AGRAWAL, CHAMAN LAL ITORORA, D.D.THAKUR, V.K.PANDITA

JUDGMENT

MISRA J. :—The present appeal by certificate is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 29th January. 1970 in Letters Patent Appeal confirming the judgment and order of the learned single Judge of the High Court dated 7th January, 1970.

2. Nanak Chand, father of the appellant was a displaced person from West Pakistan where he had left agricultural lands in village Chhota Bhukh Autar, tehsil Bahawal Nagar, district Bahawalpur. After the partition of the country his claim bearing Index No. B/BP-3/259 was verified in his name for 26 standard acres 12 1/2 units. Nanak Chand disappeared sometime in December, 1954 and a report about his disappearance was lodged by the appellants brother Dewan Chand, arrayed in this appeal as respondent No. 2, on 25th December, 1954 with the local police, Malhout, district Ferozepur, Punjab. An enquiry was made by the police in the matter and ultimately the police gave out that Nanak Chand could not be traced.

3. In the year 1956, a notice was issued in suo motu revision in regard to the verified claim referred to above, by the Additional Settlement Commissioner, Delhi to Nanak Chand, claimant. As Nanak Chand could not and di
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top