SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. BHAGWATI AND R.S. PATHAK, JJ.
P.S. Mahal and others, petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petns. Nos. 157-162 of 1976
Decided on 23-5-1984.
Advocates appeared
Mr. M. C. Bhandare, Sr. Advocate, M/s. A. K. Ganguli, D. P. Mukherjee and Miss C. K. Suchirata, Advocates with him, for Petieioners; Mr. M. M. Abdul Khader, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Girish Chandra and Miss A. Subhashini, Advocates and Mr. M. K. Ramamurthi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. J. Ramamurthi and Mrs. R. Vaigai, Advocates with him for Respondent.
Central Engineering Service (Class I) Recruitment Rules, 1954 - Employment and Service matter - Grade of Assistant Engineers - Promotion - Seniority list - Writ petition marks yet another round of litigation between two groups of Executive Engineers in Central Public Works Department of Ministry of Works & Housing, Government of India, one group consisting of promotees from grade of Assistant Executive Engineers and other consisting of promotees from grade of Assistant Engineers - Dispute between these two groups in regard to seniority has been going on for quite some time and it has created considerable discord and bitterness between these two groups which must inevitably affect efficiency of Service - It is really a matter of regret that Central Government should not have been able to bring these two groups together and evolve a commonly agreed formula acceptable to both sides - There is in Central Public Works Department of the Ministry of Works & Housing, Government of India a Service known as Central Engineering Service (Class I) - Whether letter was under Central or Provincial Government in India or Pakistan - Whether vacancies were in permanent posts or in temporary posts - Whether any persons from one class or other were promoted or not and this was made clear by giving an illustration that if there were three vacancies in a particular year – Held, Court would direct Government to prepare a new seniority list of Executive Engineers in light of observations contained in this judgment - Government will prepare such seniority list within a period of two months from today - When seniority in grade of Executive Engineers is rearranged in accordance with directions given in judgment, cases of Assistant Engineers who would have been due for consideration for promotion as Superintending Engineers and thereafter as Chief Engineers on basis of their revised seniority, will be considered by a duly constituted Departmental Promotion Committee as on dates on which they would have been due for such consideration if correct seniority had been given to them - Supernumerary posts in grades of Superintending Engineers and Chief Engineers shall be created for purpose of accommodating them and all arrears of salary and allowances shall be paid to them on basis of such retrospective promotions – Court may make it clear that those Assistant Executive Engineers who have been promoted as Superintending Engineers ox Chief Engineers up to date of this judgment shall not, on account of revised seniority in grade of Executive Engineers, be disturbed from positions which they are occupying at present but their seniority in such higher grades will have to be rearranged on the basis of directions given in judgment - Writ petition will stand disposed of
JUDGMENT
BHAGWATI, J.:— This writ petition marks yet another round of litigation between two groups of Executive Engineers in Central Public Works Department of the Ministry of Works & Housing, Government of India, one group consisting of promotees from the grade of Assistant Executive Engineers and the other consisting of promotees from the grade of Assistant Engineers. The dispute between these two groups in regard to seniority has been going on for quite some time and it has created considerable discord and bitterness between these two groups which must inevitably affect the efficiency of the Service. It is really a matter of regret that the Central Government should not have been able to bring these two groups together and evolve a commonly agreed formula acceptable to both sides. We hope that our decision in this writ petition will finally ring the curtain down on this unfortunate controversy and both groups of Executive Engineers will accept the decision ungrudgingly without any rancour or resentment and whole heartedly engage themselves in the nation buildings tasks entrusted to them.
2. There is in the Central Public Works Department of the Ministry of Works & Housing, Government of India a Service known as Central Engineering Service (Class I). This Service comprises various grades; the highest grade is that of Engineer-in-Chief and then in descending hierarchical order are the grades of Chief Engineer, Superintending Engineer, Executive Engineer and Assistant Executive Engineer. The Central Government has made rules of recruitment to this Service known as the Central Engineering Service (Class I) Recruitment Rules, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Recruitment Rules) and they are issued under SRO 1841 dated 21st May, 1954. Part I of the Recruitment Rules contains the definitions and Clause (c) of R. 2 occurring in this Part defines "Service" as Central Engineering Service Class I. Rules 3, 4 and 5 contained in Part II of the Recruitment Rules lay down the modes of recruitment to various grades in this Service in the following terms :
"3. Recruitment to the service shall made by any of the Following methods :-
(a) By competitive examination in India in accordance with Part III of these Rules.
(b) By promotion in accordance with Part IV of these Rules.
(c) By transfer in accordance with part V of these Rules.
4. (1) All appointments to the service or to posts borne upon the cadre of the Service shall be made by Government.
(2) Subject to a provision of R. 3. Government shall determine the method or method of requirement (recruitment ?) to be employed for the purpose of felling any particular vacancies in the Service or such vacancies therein as may be required to be filled during any particular period and the member of candidates to be recruited by each method.
Provided that all recruitments by competitive examination (vide Part III of the Rules) shall be to the grade of Assistant Executive Engineer, Class I only.
Seventyfive per of the vacancies in the grade of Executive Engineer, Class I, shall be filled by promotion of Assistant Executive Engineers Class I, the rest of the vacancies being filled by promotion and/or by transfer in accordance, with Parts IV and V of the Rules respectively.
5. Appointments to the Service made otherwise than by promotion will be subject to orders issued from time to time by the Ministry of Home Affaire regarding special representation in the services for specific actions of the people"Assistant Executive Engineers belong to the lowest grade in this service and they are required only through a competitive examination in accordance with part III of the Recruitment Rules. On their initial recruitment Assistant Executive Engineers are required to undergo a period of probation for two years and they are confirmed in the grade of Assistant Executive Engineers after successful completion of the period of probation .
3. There is the any another Service in the Central Public Works Department called Ce
distinguished : Bishan Sarup Gupta v. Union of India
relied on : N.K. Chauhan v. State of Gujarat
S.B.Patwardhan v. State of Maharashtra
distinguished : Shri Prithvi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Broach Borough Municipality
referred to : Patel Gordhandas Hargovindas v. Municipal Commissioner Ahmedabad
relied on : Madan Mohan Pathak v. Union of India
followed : T. Devadasan v. Union of India
Mervyn Coutinho v. Collector of Customs, Bombay
Govind Dattatray Kelkar v. Chief Collector of Imports and Exports
V.B. Badami v. State of Mysore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.