SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 113

A.N.SEN, D.A.DESAI
Abdul Rehman Antulay – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India: State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK DESAI, BINA GUPTA, GOVIND DAS, H.R.BHARDWAJ, MURLI BHANDARE, P.P.SINGH, RAM JETHMALANI

JUDGMENT

A. N. SEN, J. :— There is no merit in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

2. In my view, the writ petition challenging the validity of the order and judgment passed by this Court as nullity or otherwise incorrect cannot be entertained. I wish to make it clear that the dismissal of this writ petition will not prejudice the right of the petitioner, to approach the Court with an appropriate review petition or to file any other application which he may be entitled in law to file.

D. A. DESAI, J. :- 3. I broadly agree with the conclusion recorded by my brother.

(ORDER IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITIONS (CRL) NOS. 1149-50 OF 1984)

4. The learned Judge in deciding the matter has followed the decision of this Court. The learned Judge was perfectly justified and indeed it was the duty of the learned Judge to follow the decision of this Court which is binding on him

5. Special leave petitions are dismissed.

Petitions dismissed.

For Citation: AIR 1984 SC 1358

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top