D.A.DESAI, D.P.MADAN
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
District Judge, Unnao – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Special leave granted.
2. We heard Mr. Manchanda, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Syed, learned counsel for the Respondents.
3. The Prescribed Authority constituted under the U. P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act determined the compensation payable to respondents 3 to 6 for acquisition of the surplus land and trees in the amount of Rs. 90,637.20p. The State, of U. P. having been dissatisfied with this quantum of compensation assessed by the Prescribed Authority preferred an appeal in the Court of the District judge on September 19, 1972, but as the appeal was by that time barred by limitation, the appellant simultaneously filed an application under Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay In preferring the appeal. In support of the application under See. 5, affidavits of Sri Ahmad Ullah Khan, Shri Shiam Lal Shrivastava Tahsildar Hasanganj, Sri Ram Bahadur Saxena, Sadar Kanungo of the Office of the Assistant Compensation Commissioner and Sri Rajendra Singh, Assistant Rajeswa Anubhag-6, U. P. Civil Secretariat Lucknow, were filed. Respondents 3 to 6 contested the application seeking condonation of the delay. The learned District Judge held th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.