SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A. DESAI AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
Dr. Ramji Dwivedi, Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 1340 of 1982
Decided on 26-4-1983.
Advocates appeared
Mr. G. L. Sanghi, Sr. Advocate, M/s. R. D. Upadhaya, V. K. Pandita and S. Srinivasan, Advocates with him for Appellant; Mr. R. K. Garg, Sr. Advocate and Mr. S. N. Singh, Advocate, for Respondents.
* Civil Misc. Petn. No. 6933 of 1981, D/- 1-3-1982 reported in 1982 Lab IC 1130 (All.).
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Section 16E - U. P. Act – Section 7, 13, 15, 16-A, to 16-1 - Advertisement - Post of principal of Intermediate College - Selection Committee - Appellant, a double M.A. and holding a Doctorate applied in response to an advertisement that appeared in Hindi Daily Bhirgu Chetna and Dainik Jagran dated for post of principal of Intermediate College issued by Committee of Management of College – Selection Committee as envisaged by S. 16E of Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (Act for short) held interview - Selection Committee unanimously selected appellant for appointment to post of Principal - Pursuant to this decision of Selection Committee, Manager of Committee of Management of College issued an appointment order dated to appellant informing him that Committee of Management of Collegee vide its Resolution No. 3 dated has appointed appellant as Principal on one year probation in the scale at initial pay along with D. A. admissible under rules - Appellant was required to present himself before Manager of College and take over charge within 10 days of receipt of order of appointment, failing which appointment would be void – Held, There was nothing hanky panky in his appointment - If power to make appointment was not suspended Court would have no difficulty in upholding appointment of appellant and Court are not oblivious to machinations, who possibly thought that appellant would be a formidable rival and wanted him to be out of way - Private management, at instance of appears to have subsequently backed out from the appointment of appellant which at one stage they were willing to defend - But as there was no power of appointment – Court are unable to help appellant - However, Court would like. to make it very clear that appointment was otherwise valid, though ineffective and if appellant under orders of High Court functioned as Principal, discharged his duties and was paid - College is topless and an unfair advantage is being taken of this situation whose credentials to be appointed as Principal are still to be investigated - It is statutory duty of Commission to procecd to take effective steps to fill in post of Principal of College - It is Imperative that State Government should direct Commission to take necessary steps to fill in post of Principal of Intermediate College, within three months - Appellant would be eligible to apply for same - Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT
DESAI, J.:—Even with an ever-widening control of the State on the private management of educational institutions, the minimal residuary power still enjoyed by private management can be used to successfully harass a highly qualified teacher is the tragic lesson of this litigation.
2. Appellant, a double M.A. and holding a Doctorate applied in response to an advertisement that appeared in Hindi Daily Bhirgu Chetna and Dainik Jagran dated May 18, 1980 for the post of principal of Shrinath Intermediate College, Garhmalpur Sahulie, Distt. Ballia (College for short) issued by the Committee of Management of the College. The Selection. Committee as envisaged by S. 16E of the Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (Act for short) held the interview on April 12, 1981. The Selection Committee consisted of Shri Sudhakar Tiwari Manager/President of the Selection Committee, Shri Ram Dularey Tripathi, Principal, Nagrik Degree College. Jaunpur and Dr. Gauri Shanker Misra, Principal, Narihsun Degree College, Harihaun Distt. Jaunpur. The Selection Committee unanimously selected the appellant for appointment to the post of Principal. Pursuant to this decision of the Selection Committee, the Manager of the Committee of Management of the College issued an appointment order dated April 27, 1981 to the appellant informing him that the Committee of Management of the Collegee vide its Resolution No. 3 dated April 19, 1981 has appointed the appellant as Principal on one year probation in the scale of Rs. 550-1200 at initial pay along with D. A. admissible under the rules. The appellant was required to present himself before the Manager of the College and take over the charge within 10 days of the receipt of the order of appointment, failing which the appointment would be void. On receipt of this letter of appointment the appellant presented himself at the College on May 1, 1981 and requested the Manager to hand over charge to him. There is an endorsement below this communication by the Manager that the appellant was permitted to take charge. On the same day. the appellant wrote to the Manager of the College that as permitted by him he has assumed charge of the post of Principal at 7-30 A.M. and has started functioning. An intimation of the same was also sent to the Distt. Inspector of Schools, Ballia. The appellant on the same day circulated a notice to the staff intimating to them that he has assumed charge of the post of Principal and he has convened an urgent meeting of the staff to be held on the same day after college hours in the teachers, room.
3. It appears that the State Govt., was contemplating to bring about a radical change in the mode, method and power of appointment of the teaching staff in non Government aided schools and accordingly Secretary to the Govt. of U. P. Education Deptt. issued an order dated April 7, 1981, communicated by a radiogram to the various authorities. It reads as under :
"From Secretary to Govt. of U. P. Education Deptt. G. 0. No. 1701/15-7-FI-1(27)/ 81 dated 1-4-81, Stop. all fresh selections and appointments of Principal Headmasters and teachers including recruitment by promotion in all non-Govt. aided secondary schools except minority institutions pending further orders(.) Distt. Inspectors to ensure non-drawal of pay of teachers appointed after this date(.) Detailed instructions follow(.)"
4. Pursuant to the receipt of this radiogram. the Distt. Inspector of Schools, Ballia had sent a copy of it to the College, There is some dispute between the parties as to whether this copy of the radiogram. was received by the Management of the College but there is a letter dated May 1, 1981 addressed by the District Inspector of Schools, Ballia to the Manager of Shrinath Intermediate College which reads as under :
"Letter No. 2/26-62/80-81 dated 1-5-81
Sub: In Ref : Appointment; of Principals.
Sir,
In reference to letter No. Sri Nath Inter College dated 27-4-1981, regarding the above mentioned subject, it is informed that as so
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.