SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 193

A.P.SEN, D.A.DESAI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
A. T. Brij Paul Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
GIRISH CHANDRA, K.L.Taneja, P.Aneja, R.N.Poddar, S.L.Aneja, T.U.Mehta

Judgement Key Points

Yes, the court in this case did establish a principle regarding the measure of damages for a contractor who is illegally deprived of executing a work. The court recognized that when a party breaches a contract, the injured party is entitled to damages, including loss of expected profit. Furthermore, the court indicated that in cases involving similar types of work, a standard measure for loss of profit can be taken as a percentage of the value of the remaining work, with 15% being considered a reasonable and acceptable estimate based on the circumstances of the case. This principle was applied to quantify damages for loss of profit in the context of breach of contract related to work execution (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .


JUDGMENT

DESAI, J.—This appeal was heard along with C. A. No. 1998 of 1972 between the same parties and raising certain identical questions. In the course of hearing of both the appeals inevitably it was pointed out that with regard to identical questions the two Benches of the same High Court, though one learned Judge was common to both the Benches, arrived at irreconcilable conclusions which has to some extent resulted in denial of justice to the appellant. It would be our attempt to reconcile the approach of the Court in both the matters keeping in view the limitation oil account of the two suits having not been consolidated and evidence recorded separately in each matter.

2. On an invitation to tender sought by the erstwhile State of Saurashtra for providing cement concrete surface to Rajkot Jamnagar road for miles 18 to 40 measuring from the Rajkot end, the appellant submitted his tender quoting 712% lower than the estimated cost of the works in the amount of Rs. 16,59,900/- Only. The tender of the appellant was accepted on July 6, 1954 as per the letter of the Executive Engineer, Road Development Division, Rajkot. As agreed to between the parties, the appellant furnished secur
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top