SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 253

M.P.THAKKAR, V.D.TULZAPURKAR, V.KHALID
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Gurnam Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
DIPAK THAPAR, K.S.THAPAR, M.S.DAS BAHL, Rajiv Datta, S.K.Bagga

JUDGMENT

THAKKAR, J.—The respondent was prosecuted for an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act. The trial Court convicted him for the said offence and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment for six months. The High Court has reversed the order of conviction and set aside the sentence. The State has approached this Court by special leave and has called into question the order of acquittal.

2. The High Court has taken the view that it is unsafe to convict the appellant merely on the basis of the uncorroborated evidence pertaining to the alleged recovery of the weapon at the instance of the respondent. And that the respondent is therefore entitled to benefit of reasonable doubt. The view taken by the High Court is a plausible one. The appeal must accordingly fail and be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

For Citation: AIR 1984 SC 1799(1)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top