SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 255

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, D.P.MADAN
Sheoratan Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.Sanghi, M.S.GANESH, Ravindra Narayan, S.C.Dagadiya, S.T.DESAI

JUDGMENT

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :—Special Leave granted.

2. A complaint was laid by the State of Madhya Pradesh through the Inspector, Food and Civil Supplies, Dewas against the two petitioners Sheoratan Agarwal and Raghunandanlal Chaturvedi, the Managing Director and the Production Manager of M/s 5-S Limited, a Public Limited. Company with its registered office at Calcutta, for alleged violations of clauses 2(c)(i) and 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Pulses, Edible Oil Seeds and Edible Oil Dealers Licensing Order, 1977 and clause 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Essential Commodities (Price Exhibition and Price Control) Order, 1977 read with Ss. 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The petitioners moved the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under Ss. 397 and 482 of the Criminal P. C. to quash the proceedings against them on the ground that they could not, in law, be prosecuted unless the Company itself was prosecuted. The High Court overruled the contention raised on behalf of the petitioners. Hence these two appeals by Special Leave, under Art. 136 of the Constitution.

3. Shri S. T. Desai, learned counsel for the petitioners, urged the same contention before us, relying for that purpose upon the la















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top