SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 289

R.B.MISRA, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH
Jaspal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Additional District Judge, Bulandshahr – Respondent


Advocates:
E.C.AGARWAL, J.P.GOYAL, Rajesh Agarwal, S.K.JAIN

JUDGMENT

R. B. MISRA , J. :—The present appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 27th of March, 1979 centres round a shop No. 270 situate , in Grouceganj, Bulandshahr. This shop was owned by Ratan Lal and Naubat Singh was a tenant of the shop Naubat Singh died on 31st of August, 1974. He had no male issue but had four daughters, all of whom were married and were residing with their husbands outside Bulandshahr. He also left behind is widow who was residing in village Rampur, district Bulandshahr. He was carrying on some business in the disputed shop during his lifetime. On his death Ratan Lal, the landlord, filed an application under S. 12 read with S. 16 of the U. P. Urban Building (Regulation of letting, rent and Eviction ) Act, 1972 (for short reffered to herinafter as the U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972) for a declaration that the shop was vacant and he required the same for his personal need.

2. The application was resisted by Jaspal Singh, the present appellant, on the ground that he was the heir of Naubat Singh deceased and was in occupation of the disputed shop; that on 4th of July 1973 Naubat Singh before his death executed a will conveying a






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top