SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 295

M.P.THAKKAR, R.S.PATHAK
M. P. Mittal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Arun D.Sagar, HARBANS LAL BAJAJ, K.K.JAIN, Kailash Mehta, P.Dayal, R.N.Poddar, S.C.GUPTA

JUDGMENT

PATHAK, J.:— This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing a writ petition in limine.

2. Messrs. Depro Foods Limited entered into a contract with the Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, whereby the said Corporation underwrote preference shares of Messrs. Depro Foods Limited of Rs. 100/- each for a total value of Rs. 3.6 lacs on which a dividend of 9.5% per annum was payable. The appellant who was apparently, at the relevant time, the Managing Director of Messrs. Depro Foods Limited, executed an agreement under which he guaranteed in his personal capacity the payment of the dividend income due in respect of the aforesaid shares to the said Corporation. It is not disputed that Messrs. Depro Foods Limited did not pay Rs. 1,96,961 representing the dividend payable to the said Corporation, and therefore the appellant became personally liable as guarantor to pay that amount. It seems that on the failure of the appellant to make payment, the said Corporation invoked a provision in the Guarantee agreement which declares : -

"5. That the dues on account of this guarantee will be recove










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top