JUDGMENT

ORDER :— The present petition is a sequel to our judgment in P. K. Ramachandra Iyer v. Union of India (1984) 2 SCC 141. While allowing writ petition and Review petition a number of directions were given in that judgment in relation to the contentions raised before the Court.

2. By the present petition, the petitioner contends that the directions given by the Court have not been carried out and further directions are necessary to give full effect to the judgment of this Court. It may be clarified that a petition for directions and not for contempt has been moved. We propose to take note of the legitimate grievances canvassed on behalf of the petitioners by their learned counsel Mr. Yogeshwar Prasad.

3. The first grievance voiced is that Dr. Y. P. Gupta was at all material timer, senior to Dr. S. L. Mehta and that Dr. S. L. Mehta illegally scored a march over him. This Court directed that Dr. Y. P. Gupta will be put in the same scale in, which Dr. S. L. Mehta was put right from the very date when Dr. S. L. Mehta was awarded higher grade. This direction is specific and unambiguous, and enures for all benefits and all consequences that flow from the direction given to the Union