SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A. DESAI AND RANGANATH MISRA, JJ.
State of U.P., Appellant
Versus
M.K. Anthony, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 19 of 1976, D/-6-11-1984.
Advocates appeared
Mr. Dalveer Bhandari, for Appellant. Mr. Gobind Das, Advocate, Ms. Lily Thomas, Mr. K. N. Bhargava, Advocate with him, for Respondent.
Code of Criminal-Procedure, 1973 - Section 366 - Committed murder - Benefit of doubt - Appeal by special leave - Respondent, a resident was serving as a clerk in Cash Office of Central Railway - At relevant time he was staying with his wife deceased - Two children deceased and deceased at in a. quarter was admitted in hospital popularly known as German Hospital for some gynaecological disorder - A surgical operation was performed - When was confined in hospital respondent had left his two minor children with one, P.W. 1 - Minor operation performed onrevealed that she had a tumor in uterus and a major operation which may Cost around was considered necessary - Accordingly, on around 10 A.M - Went with his wife and children to house of respondent - He knocked on door of quarter in occupation of respondent but there was no response - Wife called Put wife of respondent but received no response - On pushing door it was found to be bolted from inside - There was a window by slide of door covered with a. screen - Whether view taken by High Court of evidence as well as circumstances proved by prosecution is reasonable - Whether conviction can be based on I extra-judicial confession or they need corroboration - Held, Court are wholly satisfied that respondent was responsible for committing murder of his wife and two children- Two dying declarations themselves provide credible evidence against respondent - Evaluation of evidence by High Court is improper and its view is utterly unreasonable and has to be discarded - Murder of near and dear ones including two innocent kids is gruesome – Court must however be careful lest shocking nature of crime may induce an instinctive reaction to the dispassionate analysis of evidence both as to offence and sentence - One circumstance that stands out in favour of respondent for not awarding capital punishment is that respondent did not commit murder of his near and dear ones actuated by any lust, sense of vengeance or for gain - Plight of an economic have not sometimes becomes so tragic that only escape route is crime - Respondent committed murder because in his utter helplessness he could not find few chips to help his ailing wife and he saw escape route by putting an end to their lives - Appeal allowed.
Key Points: - The Court evaluates the reliability of two alleged extra-judicial confessions and whether corroboration is required (!) (!) (!) . - It holds that the extra-judicial confessions of the respondent to PW 1 Nair and PW 9 Jagdish Singh are trustworthy and credible, and examines circumstantial evidence to support them (!) (!) (!) . - It discusses the role of motive (economic distress) and opportunity as circumstantial context strengthening the confession’s credibility (!) (!) . - It analyzes various corroborating elements: medical/financial hardship, loans, reservation timing, and the knife with bloodstains and nail evidence, to establish guilt beyond doubt (!) (!) (!) (!) . - The High Court’s rejection of the confessed evidence is overturned; the conviction is upheld with a reduction of sentence from death to life imprisonment (!) (!) (!) (!) . - The appeal results in restoring the Sessions Judge’s conviction but commuting the sentence to life imprisonment. The respondent must serve life imprisonment. "p_24"
Judgment
DESAI, J. :- Respondent M. K. Anthony was prosecuted for having committed murder of his wife Smt. Anna Kutti and his two children - a son Sajji aged 6 years and a daughter Rita aged 4 years during the night between February 26 and 27, 1973. Learned Sessions Judge, Jhansi convicted him for having committed murder of the aforementioned three persons and awarded him maximum penalty under the law. An appeal preferred by the respondent. with the reference made by the learned Sessions Judge under Sec. 366 of the Code of Criminal-Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the sentence came up before a division bench of the Allahabad High Court. The High Court gave the respondent the benefit of doubt and acquitted him. Hence this appeal by special leave.
2. Prosecution case briefly stated is that the respondent, a resident of Kerala, was serving as a clerk in the Cash Office of the Central Railway at Jhansi. At the relevant time he was staying with his wife deceased. Anna Kutty and two children deceased Sajji and deceased Rita at Jhansi in a. quarter of R. P. F. in Laxminagar. Smt. Anna Kutty was admitted in the hospital popularly known as German Hospital for some gynaecological disorder. A surgical operation was performed on February 22, 1973. When Smt. Anna Kutty was confined in the hospital the respondent had left his two minor children with one V., S. Radhakrishnan Nair, P.W. 1. The minor operation performed on Smt. Anna Kutty revealed that she had a tumor in the uterus and a major operation which may Cost around Rs. 600/- was considered necessary. After consulting P.W. 1 - Nair it was decided that Smt. Anna Kutty be taken to Kerala for arranging the major operation. Respondent had to pay the hospital Rs. 206/- in all. As the accused did not have the necessary cash he requested PW-1 Nair to advance a loan but as Nair was not in a position to do so, at his instance Shri Krishana Tiwari PW 14 on February 26, 1973 advanced a loan of Rs. 206/- in two instalments to the respondent. When Smt. Anna Kutty was being brought home from the hospital, on the way the respondent picked up his two children from the house of Nair and requested Sh. Nair to send his wife to the house of the respondent to look after his ailing wife and for preparing food for the children. Accordingly, on February 27, 1973 around 10 A.M. Nair went with his wife and the children to the house of the respondent. He knocked on the door of the quarter in occupation of the respondent but there was no response. Wife of Sh. Nair called Put the wife of the respondent but received no response. On pushing the door it was found to be bolted from inside. There was a window by the slide of the door covered with a. screen. On pushing aside the screen Nair and his wife were struck with horror by the scene as they found Smt. Anna Kutty and the two children of the respondent lying on the ground and - their Clothes soiled with, blood. As the wife of. Nair was shocked At the site she was taken to her house. and Nair rushed to the office where the respondent was serving and told him what he had seen. One Prabhakar Malyali, a friend of the respondent and a colleague in his office was summoned and he was asked to arrange for ambulance. One Sh. V. M. Phillips PW 12 also a common friend of Nair and the respondent met them on the way and he also accompained Nair and the respondent to his house. The respondent on reaching his house peeped from the window and started raising screems. In the meantime Phillips. PW 12 went toward the back door and found the three back doors of the house closed but not bolted., Phillips entered the house and opened the latch of the front door. In the meantime Prabhakar Malyali accompanied by the railway doctor arrived with an ambulance. The railway doctor examined Smt. Anna Kutty and the two children of the respondent and declared that they were dead. He also found that there was a cut on the neck of each of the victims. The railway doctor asked Nair to immediately
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.