D.P.MADAN, M.P.THAKKAR, R.S.PATHAK
Nepal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
Judgment
PATHAK, J.:- This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the appellants writ petition against an order terminating his services.
2. The appellant, Nepal Singh, was employed in a temporary capacity as Sub-Inspector of Police. He was serving at Shahjahanpur in 1968 when the Superintendent of Police. Shahjahanpur initiated disciplinary proceedings under S. 7 of the Police Act against him on the charge that while posted at Pithoragarh he had. in November, 1964. contracted a second marriage while his first wife was alive, and as this was done without obtaining the prior permission of the Government the appellant had violated Rule 29 of the U. P. Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956. The appellant filed a reply and denied the charge. The oral testimony of about twelve witnesses for the prosecution and an almost equal number for the defence was recorded. But in January. 1970 the Superintendent of Police, Shahjahanpur wrote to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bareilly Range that as the act alleged against the appellant related to the district of Pithoragarh the disciplinary proceedings taken by him would be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.