Judgment

VENKATARAMIAH, J.:- We have heard Shri Navin Malhotra, amicus curiae, and the learned Attorney- General for the State of Tamil Nadu. In the State of Andhra Pradesh v. Vallabhapuram Ravi (1984) (2) Scale 386 : (1984 Cri LJ 15.11) (SC) (Criminal Appeal No. 254 of 1984) in which judgment was delivered on Sept. 14, 1984 this Court has held that adolescent offenders kept in a Borstal School by virtue of orders made by the State Government under S. 10-A of the Andhra Borstal Schools Act. 1925 cannot be detained in the Borstal School or in any other place after they have attained 23 years of age and that they should be released. The provisions of the Tamil Nadu Borstal Schools Act. 1925 are identical with the provisions of the Andhra Borstal Schools Act. 1925. In the judgment referred to above the decision of the Madras High Court in In re Ganpat, 1983 Cri LJ 509 which had taken the view that after S. 433A of the Criminal P. C. 1973 came into force a person who was convicted of an offence punishable under S.302 of Penal Code but sentenced to imprisonment for life and who was by virtue of an order passed under S. 10-A of the Tamil Nadu Borstal Schools Act. 1925 detained in a Borsta