SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 336

A.N.SEN, RANGANATH MISRA
Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Trichur – Appellant
Versus
Ramanuja Match Industries – Respondent


Advocates:
GIRISH CHANDRA, M.K.BANERJI, R.N.Poddar

Judgment

RANGANATH MISRA, J. :- The short point which arises for determination in this appeal by special leave is as to whether a partner of a firm is an "employee" within the meaning of Section 2(9) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the Act). Respondent Ramanuja Match industries which is a firm engaged in manufacturing of matches within the Trichur area of Kerala State and the question as to whether it is covered under, the provisions of the Act fell for consideration. The Inspector found that there were 18 regular employees and three of the partners who worked regularly for wages were to be put together. Thus the number of 20 employees as required by the Act was satisfied and the respondent did incur liability for contribution. The respondent challenged its liability before the Employees Insurance Court at Calicut by contending that partners were not employees and when the three partners were excluded, the total number of employees did not exceed the statutory minimum. The Insurance Court found in favour of the respondent and an appeal under the Act was carried to the High Court by the appellant and a Division Bench of that Court following its earlier




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top