O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, V.KHALID
Tulsi Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
Judgment
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :- On 17-8-1979 the Food Inspector, Sorar, purchased 375 grams of Soyabean oil from the shop of the petitioner, Tulsiram. The Soyabean oil purchased was divided into three parts; each part was filled in a bottle; each bottle was sealed; and, one of the bottles was sent to the Public Analyst, Raipur for analysis The Public Analyst found that the sample was adulterated as it contained traces of cotton seed oil. On 29-11-1979 a complaint was filed on the basis of the, report of the Public Analyst, in the court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Balod. On 17-12-1979 a copy of the report of the Public Analyst was forwarded to the petitioner as required by Rule 9-A of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules. The accused-petitioner however made no application to the trial Court to have one of the samples sent to the Central Food Laboratory for further analysis. He was content merely to deny offence. After due trial he was convicted by the Magistrate on 8-9-1982, under S. 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-. The appeal preferred by the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.