SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY AND V. KHALID, JJ.
Satya Pal Gopal Das, Appellant
Versus
Smt. Panchubala Dasi and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 852 of 1971, D/- 18-1-1985.
Versus
Mr. D. N. Mukherjee, Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee and Mr. Tarun Mukherjee, Advocates, for Appellant; Mr. G. L. Sanghi and Mr. Gobind Mukhoty, Sr. Advocates and Mr. S. C. Birla Advocate with them, for Respondents.
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 133(1)(a) - Will - Illegitimate Son - Disputed Signatures - Nrisingha Prosad Das was a well to do person, a Zamindar and a businessman - His only son, Das died leaving behind a child-less widow - A few days later, he lost his only other issue, a daughter - Shortly after death of his two children, he came into touch with Binapani, wife of Satya Gopal Das, who became his mistress - A son Ramendra Narayan Das was born to Binapani - Will was written by (OPW-4) and bears attestation of (deceased widow), (OPW- 13), (PW-I), (PW-5) and (OPW-9) - Pashupati Mondal and Kalipada Das were trusted employees of Nrisingha Prosad Das, as apparent from letters Exhibits 2(a) to 2(z) and 2(z) series - Satyendra Nath Mullick was private tutor employed by Nrisingha Prosad Das for boy Ramendra Narayan Das - Satya Gopal Das sought probate of will and filed Will case in court of the Additional District Judge - Suit was contested by Panchu Bala Dasi - Whether Ramendra Narayan is illegitimate son of Nrisingha Prosad Das or son of Satya Gopal Das - Whether signatures purporting to be those of attesting witnesses are in fact theirs and whether these signatures were made in presence of testator - Whether these signatures were made in presence of testator - Whether testator signed will in, presence of attestors – Held, Handwriting expert no doubt gave evidence to contrary, but as rightly observed by Trial Court, comparison of handwriting is yet not a definite science and as admitted by expert himself, there are pictorial similarities between specimen signatures and disputed signatures and "if one who has just learnt to put signatures does not sign for some time and wants to put signature after lapse of time, say four or five years, writer may show certain changes" - Panchubala Dasi admitted that her mother-in-law hardly knew how to write – Court must mention here that letters exhibits 2(a) to 2(z) and 2(z) series were admitted in evidence by consent of parties, but for some curious reasons, High Court would not look into them except cursorily – Court have perused them in detail and learned counsel on either side did not raise any objection to our perusal of the documents - To end with what court stated at beginning, there cannot be slightest doubt that will was executed by Nrisingha Prosad Das and was registered on. his presenting it to Sub Registrar for registration - Thereafter, Nrisingha Prosad Das lived for nearly four years and took no steps to have will cancelled or revoked - These circumstances should dispel any suspicion that may otherwise attach itself to will – Court do not think that it is necessary to go into any further details of evidence - Judgment of High Court is set aside and judgment of Trial Court is restored – Court however record an undertaking given by Shri D. N. Mukherjee, learned counsel for appellant that respondent will not be disturbed from residing in house in which she is now resident - She will have no other right - Appeal allowed.
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J:- Nrisingha Prosad Das was a well to do person, a Zamindar and a businessman, of Katwa. His only son, Surya Narayana Das died on April 1, 1935 leaving behind a child-less widow Panchu Bala Dasi. A few days later, he lost his only other issue, a daughter. Shortly after the death of his two children, he came into touch with Binapani, wife of Satya Gopal Das, who became his mistress. A son Ramendra Narayan Das was born to Binapani on February 1, 1936. There is a question whether Ramendra Narayan is the illegitimate son of Nrisingha Prosad Das or the son of Satya Gopal Das. But the undoubted fact remains that almost right from his birth, Ramendra Narayan Das was brought up as a child of the family of Nrisingha Prosad Das and it was round this child that the entire life of the family revolved. Not only Nrisingha Prosad Des, but also his wife Kali Dasi and daughter-in-law Panchu Bala Dasi lavished their love and affection on him, though there was some suggestion and argument in the lower court that the love and affection showered on Ramendra Narayan Des was superficial. It is no longer disputed before us that Ramendra Narayan Das was greatly and genuinely loved by all the members of the family, that is, Nrisingha Prosad Das, his wife, Kali Dasi and his daughter-in-law, Panchu Bala Dasi. That he was so dearly loved and treated with great affection is clear from the series of letters written by Nrisingha Prosad Das, Kali Dasi and Panchu Bala Dasi Exhibits 2(a) to 2(z) and 2(z) series. Nrisingha Prosad Das died on March 12, 1950. His widow Kali Dasi died on January 8, 1951. On February 1, 1954, Satya Gopal Das propounded a will said to have been executed by Nrisingha Prosad Das on June 21, 1946 and registered on June 30, 1946. By this will the testator purported to give all his properties including those which he claimed to have purchased benami in the 501 names of his wife and daughter-in-law to Ramendra Narayan Das. It was mentioned in the will that he had given sufficient amounts of cash to his wife and daughter-in-law for their comfortable maintenance and pilgrimages. The will contained (a) lengthy schedule of properties and it is sufficient at this juncture to say that every page of the will contains the signature of Nrisingha Prosad Das. The will was written by Bharat Chandra Das (OPW-4) and bears the attestation of Kali Dasi (deceased widow), Panchu Bala Dasi (OPW- 13), Pashupati Mondal (PW-I), Kalipada Das (PW-5) and Satyendra Nath Mullick (OPW-9). We may mention here that Pashupati Mondal and Kalipada Das were the trusted employees of Nrisingha Prosad Das, as apparent from the letters Exhibits 2(a) to 2(z) and 2(z) series. Satyendra Nath Mullick was the private tutor employed by Nrisingha Prosad Das for the boy Ramendra Narayan Das. Satya Gopal Das sought probate of the will and filed Will case No. 1/62/7 of 1957/1954 (1953/54?) in the court of the Additional District Judge, Burdwan. The suit was contested by Panchu Bala Dasi. Various pleas were raised and voluminous evidence was let in. After a consideration of the entire evidence, probate was granted with a. copy of the will annexed. Panchu Bala Dasi preferred an appeal to the High Court of Calcutta. The appeal was allowed by Purushottam Chatterjee and A. C. Seri, JJ. by two separate judgments. The grant of probate was set aside. Satya Gopal Das obtained a certificate under Art. 133(1)(a) of the Constitution to prefer an appeal to this court and the appeal is now before us.
2. We are far from satisfied that the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of the Trial Court. Such suspicious circumstances, as the High Court was able to point out, were more than dispelled by certain outstanding features of the case which we shall presently enumerate. The most suspicious circumstance, according to the High Court, was that the two signatures, purporting to be those of Kali Dasi and Panchu Bala Dasi on the will, were not or did not appear to be tho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.