SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 31

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, JJ.
Yogeshwar Jaiswal, etc., Appellants
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 53, 54-57, 202-04 and 255 of 1982, D/- 31-1-1985.
Advocates appeared
Mr. J. P. Goyal, S. N. Kacker, Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Advocates and V. K. Verma, V. J. Francis, Mahabir Singh, and N. S. Malik, Advocates with them for Appellants; Mr. V. M. Tarkunde, K. K. Venugopal, Prithviraj, Sr. Advocates, and Mr. B. S. Chauthan, Rani Chhabra, R. K. Jain, Mrs. Shobha Dikshit and Raju Ramachandran, Advocates with them, for Respondents.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 68D, 68C, 68D(1)(2), 68F(1D), 58, 68F(1C) - State Transport - Notification - Operation of Carriages - A notification was published by State transport undertaking of State in U. P. Gazette inviting objections to a draft scheme providing for exclusive operation of its own stage carriages over thirteen routes within jurisdiction of Regional Transport Authority of Meerut - It is unfortunate that no decision has yet been taken by State Government for one reason or other - In meanwhile members of public as well as motor operators have become subject to several constraints arising from publication of such a scheme - Whether to exclusion, complete or partial, of other persons or otherwise, State transport undertaking may prepare a scheme giving particulars of nature of services proposed to be rendered, area or route proposed to be covered. and such other particulars respecting thereto as may be prescribed, and shall cause every such scheme to be published in Official Gazette and also in such other manner as State Government may direct – Held, Court therefore, consider that in interests of justice it is appropriate to bring to an end proceedings under section 68D of Act expeditiously – Court would have perhaps considered question of quashing scheme itself at this stage but since no such contention is urged before court, court feel that it is sufficient to issue a direction to State Government to pass orders under section 68D(2) of Act approving scheme with or without any modification or rejecting it or to pass any other order thereon which it may pass under that provision – Court issue a direction accordingly - If State Government approves scheme with or without any modification, such approved scheme shall be published under section 68D(3) of Act - If State Government fails to dispose of matter accordingly within time specified above, scheme published under section 68C of Act shall stand quashed - Order of Tribunal and order of High Court to extent they cancel temporary permits issued in favour of appellants are set aside - Appellants are permitted to operate their services under temporary permits issued to them under section 68F(1C) of Act and operation of said temporary permits shall come to an end in accordance with law - Appeal Disposed of.

Judgment

VENKATARAMIAH, J.: - The lamentable delay of nearly fourteen years involved in the State Government of Uttar Pradesh passing its order under section 68D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on a scheme published under section 68C thereof has been the main cause of these appeals by special leave filed against the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dated November 27, 1981.

2. A notification dated November 17, 1971 was published under section 68C of the Act by the State transport undertaking of the State of Uttar Pradesh in the U. P. Gazette dated November 27, 1971 inviting objections to a draft scheme providing for the exclusive operation of its own stage carriages over thirteen routes within the jurisdiction of the Regional Transport Authority of Meerut. It is unfortunate that no decision has yet been taken by the State Government under section 68D of the Act for one reason or the other. In the meanwhile the members of the public as well as the motor operators have become subject to several constraints arising from the publication of such a scheme.

3. Chapter IVA of the Act was introduced by Act 100 of 1956 into the Act with the object of making provision for operation of motor vehicles to the exclusion, complete or partial, of other persons for the purpose of providing an efficient, adequate, economical and properly co-ordinated transport service to the community. The provisions contained in Chapter IVA of the Act and the Rules made thereunder are declared as having overriding effect on the provisions in Chapter IV of the Act which contains provisions relating to control of transport vehicles and all other laws. Section 68C of the Act provides that where any State transport undertaking is of opinion that for the purpose of providing an efficient, adequate, economical and properly co-ordinated road transport service, it is necessary in the public interest that road transport services in general or in any particular class of such service in relation to any area or route or portion thereof should be run and operated by the State transport undertaking, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of other persons or otherwise, the State transport undertaking may prepare a scheme giving particulars of the nature of the services proposed to be rendered, the area or route proposed to be covered. and such other particulars respecting thereto as may be prescribed, and shall cause every such scheme to be published in the Official Gazette and also in such other manner as the State Government may direct. On the publication of the scheme, any person already providing transport facilities by any means along or near the area or route proposed to be covered by the scheme, any association representing persons interested in the provision of road transport facilities recognised in this behalf by the State Government and any local authority or police authority within whose jurisdiction any part of the area or route proposed to be covered by the scheme lies may, within thirty days from the date of the publication of the scheme in the Official Gazette, file objections to it before the State Government. The State Government may after considering the objections and after giving an opportunity to the objector or his representatives and the representatives of the State transport undertaking to be heard in the matter if they so desire, approve or modify the scheme. This is the substance of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 68D of the Act. Under sub-section (3) thereof the scheme approved or modified has to be published in the Official Gazette and such scheme is called the approved scheme and the area or route to which it relates is called the notified area or notified route. The provisions of section 68C and, section 68D of the Act clearly indicate that any scheme which is intended for providing efficient, adequate, economical or properly co-ordinated transport service should be approved either as it is or







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top