SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 40

V.D.TULZAPURKAR, V.KHALID
State of Mysore – Appellant
Versus
R. S. Kasi – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK SHARMA, BINA TAMTA, LALIT BHARDWAJ, M.VIRAPPA, MADHU MULCHANDANI, R.B.DATAR

Judgment

JUDGMENT :- There is no substance in this appeal challenging the High Courts judgment rendered on 7th April, 1969 in writ petition No. 2350 of 1966 whereby the High Court struck down Governments order dated 1st October, 1963 repatriating the respondent to his so-called parent department, namely, Department of Agriculture.

2. Admittedly by a Governments order dated 13th February 1963 Cardamom Development Scheme in the Department of Agriculture (where the respondent was working as a Research Assistant) along with 12 other Development Schemes and other research schemes stood transferred to the Department of Horticulture and para 2 of the said Government order stated that the staff working in several schemes should continue to work in the respective schemes but they should henceforth be under the control of the Director of Horticulture for all administrative and disciplinary purposes. As a result of this order the respondent stood transferred to the Department of Horticulture. On October 1, 1963 the Government passed a repatriation order repatriating the respondent from the Department of Horticulture back to the Department of Agriculture and this order was challenged by the resp





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top