SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 63

A.P.SEN, D.A.DESAI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Shiva Parashad Das: Ram Parshad – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.CHATTERJEE

Judgment

BALAKRISHNA ERADI, J.:- In these two appeals filed by Special leave against two judgments of the Orissa High Court the question raised is identical namely whether an order of suspension from service passed against a Government servant falls within the scope and purview of Art. 311 of the Constitution. The judgment appealed against the Civil Appeal No. 201 of 1971 is prior in point of time and in the judgment under challenge in C. A. No. 200 of 1971 the High Court has merely followed the former judgment. We shall, therefore, refer only to the facts relating to C.A. No. 201 of 1971.

2. The respondent Shri Ram Parshad was appointed as a Forester by the Conservator of Forests, Berhampur, District Ganjam, on 17-7-1952. Subsequently while working as a Forester under the District Forest Officer. Ghumsur North Division the respondent was placed under suspension by an order dated 26-2-1969 passed by the said District Officer, pending enquiry into charges of negligence of duties. The respondent thereupon filed a Writ Petition in the High Court of Orissa under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the order of suspension passed against him on the ground that it was made in contrave






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top