SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 98

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.B.MISRA
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Rao Sham Rao Deshmukh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, M.N.SHROFF, U.R.Lalit, Y.S.Desai

Judgment

VENKATARAMAIAH, J.:- Sham Rao Bhagwant Rao Deshmukh and his son, Narayan Rao were members of a joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara School of law. His wife Sulochanabai and his mother Gangabai alias Taibai were also the members of that family. The said family owned extensive properties which included agricultural lands situated in fourteen villages. Sham Rao died on June15,1957 after the coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and on his death his interest in the coparcenary property devolved on his son, wife and mother in equal shares under section 6 of the Act, such interest being the share that would have been allotted to him if a partition of the family property had taken place immediately before his death irrespective of whether he was entitled to claim partition or not. According to the law governing the above family which was governed by the Bombay School under which the mother also was entitled to a share at a partition between her husband and her son equal to that of her son one-third share in the family property could have been allotted to the share of Sham Rao immediately before his death had a partition t























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top