SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 92

A.V.VARADARAJAN, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
N. Horangse – Appellant
Versus
M. Tsubongse – Respondent


Advocates:
C.S.VAIDYANATHAN, K.K.LAHRI, KAPIL SIBAL, MANIK KARANJAVALA

Judgment

VARADARAJAN, J.:- This appeal by the respondent in Election Petition No. 3 of 1983 on the file of Gauhati High Court is directed against the judgment of a learned single Judge. allowing the election petition and setting aside the election of the appellant Horangse from the Longkhim-Chre constituency of the, Nagaland Legislative Assembly on the ground of corrupt practice namely presentation of four red waist-coats to three Gaon Burahs and one Barik of Lirise village on 27-10-1982 to induce them to cast their votes in his favour.

2. The respondent/ election petitioner. M. Tsubongse who contested as it Congress (1) candidate lost to the appellant who contested its a Naga National Democratic Party candidate (for short NNDP) by a margin of 133 votes in the election held on 10-11-1982. He filed his election petition seeking the appellants election to be set aside on the ground that he was guilty of four instances of corrupt practice falling under S. 123(1) of the Representation of the People Act. 1951 (for short the Act) and on three other grounds, namely: (1) display of a banner with the caption "Do not sell Nagaland to India", a corrupt practice within the meaning of S. 123(3 A)















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top