SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 94

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, R.S.PATHAK
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax, Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Kantilal Manilal – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.VERMA, A.Subhashini, B.B.Ahuja, K.J.JOHN, R.N.Poddar, S.C.Manchanda, S.T.DESAI

Judgment

PATHAK, J. :- These appeals are directed against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court disposing of a wealth tax reference and answering the following question of law against the Revenue :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of S. 2(m)(iii)(a) were not applicable in respect of liabilities arising under the wealth tax assessments of the assessee for the assessment years 1960-61 and 1961-62?"

2. For the purpose of determining the assessees net wealth in assessment proceedings under the Wealth-tax Act in respect of the assessment years 1961-62 and 1962-63, the corresponding valuation dates being March 31, 1961 and March 31, 1962, the assessee claimed a deduction of certain sums representing the estimated liabilities on account of income tax and wealth tax. The claim was rejected by the Wealth-tax Officer in both assessments, On appeal by the assessee, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax allowed a part of the claim. In the appeal pertaining to the assessment year 1961-62, he allowed a deduction of Rs. 22,679/- on account of wealth tax relating to the assessment year 1960-61, Rs. 36,692/




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top