SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 134

A.P.SEN, V.D.TULZAPURKAR, D.A.DESAI
Pokar Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.Mulla, B.D.SHARMA, S.K.JAIN, SOBHAG MAL JAIN, SURYA KANT SHARMA

Judgment

D.A. DESAI, J.:- Special leave granted.

2. Unusual though it may appear to be, under a compelling necessity in the interest of justice, we would depart from the ordinary response of this Court to matters involving bail. Ordinarily, this Court is loath to interfere with the orders granting or refusing bail but it cannot be an insurmountable obstacle in the way of rectifying an order which tends to disclose miscarriage of justice.

3. An incident occurred on August, 23, 1983 in which one Bhanwaria, son of the present appellant received fatal injuries resulting in his death. An information was lodged with the Police Station, Khedapa, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan State about the occurrence on August 24, 1983 around 11.30 A.M. At that time, Bhanwaria was alive and the offence was registered under Ss. 307, 447 read with S. 149 And under Ss. 148, 379 and 327 of the Penal Code. When the hospital authority sent the message that Bhanwaria, the victim of assault, who was admitted in the hospital for treatment has succumbed to his injuries, the Investigating Officer also added an offence under S. 302 IPC. Soon thereafter on Sept. 29, 1983, the second respondent Chandan Singh s/o Shri Ranji















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top