SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 309

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, R.B.MISRA
Life Insurance Corporation Of India – Appellant
Versus
Kiran Sinha – Respondent


Judgment

JUDGMENT:- Special. Leave is granted.

2. We have heard the learned Attorney-General and Shri A. K. Sen, learned counsel for the respondent. The High Court could not have in the circumstances of this case directed the payment of the money claimed under the insurance policies in question in a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The only remedy available to the respondent in this case was A suit before a civil judgment of the High Court is, therefore, set aside.

3. The learned Attorney-General states that he would however recommend to the Board of the Life Insurance Corporation to pay a sum of Rs. 40,000/- to the respondent in full settlement of her claim. Shri A. K. Sen submits that the respondent would accept the sum of Rs. 40,000/- if paid, in full settlement of the claim against the Life Insurance Corporation. We hope that the amount will be paid to the respondent within six weeks.

4. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No. costs.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1985 SC 1265

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top