A.P.SEN, D.A.DESAI, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
Chander Kala – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kishan – Respondent
Judgment
TULZAPURKAR, J.:- Ordinarily this Court does not interfere with the acquittal recorded by the High Court in favour of an accused but this Court cannot shirk its, responsibility when it comes accross an acquittal recorded by the High Court in the mom perfunctory manner leading to great injustice and the instant case being one such we proceed to discharge our duty.
2. The appellant Smt. Chander Kala (hereinafter called the complainant) was working as a teacher in the Govt. Middle School, Pubri since about January 1977 and the respondent Ram Kishan (hereinafter referred to as the accused) was the Head Master of that School. The complainants case was that the accused abusing his superior position used to tease her by cutting indecent jokes with her and also about her in the presence of other teachers with a view to cause annoyance to her. For instance he used to pass a remark (addressing it to her) in the presence of others "when I see you I forget my beloved" as also the remark "we would go to Jail. together and live there in the same cell." According to her on finding some mistake or other in her work he used to call her and make overtures displaying his evil desires which she
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.