SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 173

A.P.SEN, D.A.DESAI, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
Chander Kala – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kishan – Respondent


Judgment

TULZAPURKAR, J.:- Ordinarily this Court does not interfere with the acquittal recorded by the High Court in favour of an accused but this Court cannot shirk its, responsibility when it comes accross an acquittal recorded by the High Court in the mom perfunctory manner leading to great injustice and the instant case being one such we proceed to discharge our duty.

2. The appellant Smt. Chander Kala (hereinafter called the complainant) was working as a teacher in the Govt. Middle School, Pubri since about January 1977 and the respondent Ram Kishan (hereinafter referred to as the accused) was the Head Master of that School. The complainants case was that the accused abusing his superior position used to tease her by cutting indecent jokes with her and also about her in the presence of other teachers with a view to cause annoyance to her. For instance he used to pass a remark (addressing it to her) in the presence of others "when I see you I forget my beloved" as also the remark "we would go to Jail. together and live there in the same cell." According to her on finding some mistake or other in her work he used to call her and make overtures displaying his evil desires which she
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top