SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI AND V. KHALID, JJ.
Chairman-cum-Managing Director, United India Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. and others, etc. Appellants
Versus
Shri K.S. Vishwanathan and others, etc. Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 880-882 of 1980; Transfer Cases Nos. 360-363 of 1983 and Civil Appeals Nos. 2564-65 of 1984 and 235 of 1985 and 367 of 1980, D/- 1-8-1985.
WITH
Chairman-cum-Managing Director, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and others, etc. Appellants
Versus
Joy J. Mannummal and others etc., Respondents.
AND
Civil Appeals Nos. 2564-65 of 1984 and 235 of 1985 and 367 of 1980.
WITH
M/s. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and others, etc. Appellants
Versus
Shri Harbhajan Singh and others, etc. Respondents.
General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 – Section 4(2), 5(2) - Companies Act – Section 4(1), 9 - Integration of services - Acquisition and transfer of shares - Appeals and transferred cases arise out of problems connected with integration of services consequent on nationalisation of general insurance business - Management of undertakings of all insurers carrying on general insurance business was vested in Central Government, pending nationalisation, by General Insurance Ordinance - Process of nationalisation was completed by the enactment of General Insurance Business Act, 1972, providing for acquisition and transfer of shares of Indian Insurance Companies and undertakings of other existing insurers. Existing insurer was defined to mean every insurer management of whose undertaking has vested in Central Government under S. 3 of General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 and included undertakings of Life Insurance Corporation in so far as it related to the general insurance business carried – Held, There is no basis for this complaint since categorisation was made on the basis of the actual work turned out by the officers concerned during year of consideration - In Civil Appeal a further point was made by the appellants that a writ of mandamus had been straightway issued to categorise respondents as Officers - According to learned counsel for the appellants all that High Court could have done, if it agreed with submission made before it by petitioners, was to direct the appropriate authority to reconsider the question of categorisation and not to straightway itself order categorisation - There appears to be some force in this submission also. Civil Appeals are all allowed and the respective judgments of High Courts - Order accordingly.
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- These appeals and transferred cases arise out of problems connected with the integration of services consequent on the nationalisation of general insurance business. The management of the undertakings of all insurers carrying on general insurance business was vested in the Central Government, pending nationalisation, by the General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Ordinance. The process of nationalisation was completed by the enactment of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972, providing for the acquisition and transfer of shares of Indian Insurance Companies and undertakings of other existing insurers. Existing insurer was defined to mean every insurer the management of whose undertaking has vested in the Central Government under S. 3 of the General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 and included the undertakings of the Life Insurance Corporation in so far as it related to the general insurance business carried on by it. Indian insurance company was defined to mean an existing insurer having a charge capital who is a company within the meaning of the Companies Act. Corporation was defined to mean the General Insurance Corporation of India to be formed under S. 9 of the Act. S. 4(1) of the Act provided that on the appointed day, all the shares in the capital of every Indian insurance company shall, stand transferred to and vested in the Central Government. S. 4(2) required the Central Government to transfer not less than ten shares of every such company to such persons as may be specified to enable the Indian insurance company to function as a Government company. S. 5(1), provided that on the appointed day, the undertaking of every existing insurer who was not an Indian insurance company shall stand transferred to and vested in the Central Government. S. 5(2) provided for the transfer of the undertaking to and vesting of it in more than one Indian insurance company in such manner as might be specified. S. 6 provided for the effect of transfer on undertaking. S. 7 provided for the transfer of service of existing employees in certain cases. Sub-sections (1)-and (2) of 8, 7 are important for the purpose of the present appeals and may, therefore, be usefully extracted :
"7(1). Every whole-time officer or other employee of an existing insurer other than an Indian insurance company who was employed by that insurer wholly or mainly in connection. with his general insurance business immediately before the appointed day shall, on the appointed, day, become an officer or other employee, as the case may be, of the Indian insurance company in which the undertaking of that insurer or that part of the undertaking to which the service of the officer or other employee related has vested, and shall hold his office or service under the Indian insurance company on the same terms and conditions and with the same rights to pension, gratuity and other matters as would hove been admissible to him if there had been no such vesting, and shall continue to do so unless and until his employment in the Indian insurance company in which the undertaking or part has vested is terminated or until his remuneration, terms and conditions art duly altered by that Indian insurance company :
Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any such officer or other employee who has given, in writing, notice to the Central Government or to any person nominated in this behalf by that Government before the appointed day intimating his intention of not becoming an officer or employee of the Indian insurance company in whom the undertaking or part thereof to which his service relates has vested.
(2) If any question arises as to whether any person was a whole-time officer or employee, or as to whether any officer or employee, was employed wholly or mainly in connection with the general insurance business of the existing insurer referred to in sub-section (1) immediately before the appointed day, the question
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.