SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 246

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. PATHAK AND AMARENDRA NATH SEN, JJ.
State of Orissa, Appellant
Versus
Sridhar Kumar Malik and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 545 and 546 of 1980, D/- 31-7-1985.
AND
State of Orissa, Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Das and others, Respondents.
Advocates appeared
Mr. P. Govindan Nair, Sr. Advocate, Mr. R. K. Mehta and Mrs. Baby Krishnan Advocates with him, for Appellant; Mr. B. P. Maheshwari, Advocate for Nos. 1-2 in C. A. No. 545 of 1980 and for No. 1 in C. A. No. 546 of 1980, for Respondents and G. S. Chatterjee, Advocate (not present) for Respondent No. 3 in Civil Appeal No. 545 of 1980.

Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, BABY KRISHNAN, G.S.CHATTERJEE, P.GOVINDAN NAYAR, R.K.MEHTA

Headnote:

Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 - Section 417-A, 4 – Quashing notification - Purpose of constituting - Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 provides for the constitution of Municipalities and application and enforcement of various provisions commonly found in legislation dealing with local self-government - Include provisions relating to public health, supply of water for domestic use, lighting, public and private drainage, conservancy, maintenance and repair of public roads, building regulations, markets, slaughter houses, burial and burning grounds, places of public resort and entertainment, as well as provisions for raising taxes to enable municipalty to fulfil its functions and obligations - Ordinarily, the provisions of Orissa Municipal Act apply to towns, for under S. 4 a town alone can be constituted into a municipality - But under Chapter XXX-A of Act State Government has been empowered to apply provisions of Act to other areas, conveniently described as "notified areas" Section 417-A in Chapter – Held, legislature did not consider it sufficient that the proclamation was published in official Gazette. It is a notorious fact that few people beyond those who belong to official community actually read official Gazette - legislature imposed the further requirement that proclamation should be published in a newspaper circulating in area - A newspaper today has become a basic medium for communication with the people - Its effectiveness in that regard cannot be disputed, even as its influence in the dissemination of information cannot be underestimated - Reach out to people, it must be published in a language with which they are familiar - In so fundamental a matter as local self-government legislature intended that an opportunity should be available to all persons residing within the area to submit their objections - Local language of the area is Oriya, and therefore the State Government should have published proclamation in language in newspaper - On this point also we find ourselves in agreement with High Court - Appeals are dismissed

Judgment

R. S. PATHAK, J. :- These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment and order dated Feb. 27, 1978 of the High Court of Orissa allowing two writ petitions and quashing a notification issued by the State Government for the purpose of constituting a notified area under the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950.

2. The Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 provides for the constitution of Municipalities and the application and enforcement of various provisions commonly found in legislation dealing with local self-government. They include provisions relating to public health, supply of water for domestic use, lighting, public and private drainage, conservancy, maintenance and repair of public roads, building regulations, markets, slaughter houses, burial and burning grounds, places of public resort and entertainment, as well as provisions for raising taxes to enable the municipalty to fulfil its functions and obligations. Ordinarily, the provisions of the Orissa Municipal Act apply to towns, for under S. 4 a town alone can be constituted into a municipality. But under Chapter XXX-A of the Act the State Government has been empowered to apply the provisions of the Act to other areas, conveniently described as "notified areas" Section 417-A in that Chapter provides :

"417. (1) The State Government may by notification declare that it is necessary to make administrative provision for all or any of the purposes of this Act in any area, specified in the notification other than a municipality.

(1-a) Before the publication of a notification under sub-section (1) the State Government shall cause to be published in the Official Gazette and also at least in one newspaper, circulating in the area a proclamation announcing the intention of Government to issue such notification and inviting all persons residing within such area to submit. their objections, if any, in writing to the District Magistrate within one month from the date of publication of the proclamation in the Official Gazette.

(1-b) The District Magistrate shall, with all reasonable despatch, forward all objections so submitted along with his views thereon to the State Government who shall, before publication of the notification under sub-section (1), take into consideration the objections and views forwarded as above.

(2) An area, in respect of which such a notification has issued, is hereinafter called a "notified area".

3. In August 1972, the State Government proclaimed their intention to issue a notification under sub-s. (1) of S. 417-A of the Act in respect of certain areas in the district of Ganjam, and invited objections from persons residing within the area. The proclamation was published in English in the Orissa Gazette, and in the same language in a local Oriya newspaper, the "Daily Samaj". It seems that no objections were received and on March 31, 1977, the State Government issued a notification constituting with effect from April 1, 1977, the area specified in the appended Schedule a notified area in terms of sub-s. (1) of S. 417- A of the Act. The notification stated that the notified area would consist of two villages, Ganjam and Damodarpur, and that all the provisions of the Act would be applied to the notified area.

4. The residents of the villages Ganjam and Damodarpur filed writ petitions in the High Court challenging the validity of the notification dated March 31, 1977. Two points were taken in the main. It was contended that the proclamation conveying the intention of the State Government to constitute a notified area was vague in content and did not specify whether all the purposes of the Act or only some of them, and if so which, were to be the subject of administrative provision in relation to the area. The residents of the area, it was urged, were thus deprived of a full and proper opportunity to express, their views on the proposal of the Government. The second contention was that most of the residents did not know English and as the proclamation was made in th


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top