SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 354

R.S.PATHAK, RANGANATH MISRA
Harbans Lal – Appellant
Versus
Jagmohan Saran – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, G.L.SANGHI, LALITA KOHLI, MANOJ SVARUP, SHANKAR GOPAL PAGIRE

JUDGMENT

R.S. PATHAK, J. :— This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court allowing the respondents writ petition on the finding that the accommodation let out to the appellant must be deemed to be vacant.

2. The respondent is the landlord and the appellant is the tenant of a shop in Mohalla Nan Panjan, Khurja in the district of Bulandshahr. The respondent filed a petition under S. 12 read with S. 16 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 alleging that the accommodation had been sub-let by the appellant to one Yadram, that the appellant had ceased to occupy the shop and had allowed it to be occupied by Yadram and his son Madan Lal, neither of whom was a member of the appellants family. He claimed a declaration that the shop had fallen vacant and that it should be released to him.

3. The Prescribed Authority made an order dated Oct. 30, 1976, rejecting the respondents petition, on the finding that he had failed to prove that the appellant had sublet the shop and that it could be deemed to be vacant. He found that the appellant had established that he was conducting his business of selling vegetables i













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top