SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 405

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P. SEN AND D.P. MADON, JJ.
Union of India and another, Petitioners
Versus
R.G. Kashikar and another, Respondents.
Spl Leave Petn.(Civil) No. 12335 of 1985.
Decided on 20-12-1985.

Advocates:
G.SUBRAMANIAN, M.K.BANERJI, R.N.Poddar

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 14, 16, 226 and 258 – Special Leave Petition - Transfer of Instructors - Special Leave Petition Government of India in Ministry of Education introduced National Discipline Scheme which came to be redesignated as National Fitness Corps – Respondent was appointed as an Instructor Grade National Discipline Scheme in respondent was continuing as an employee of Central Government proposal was made for transfer of Instructors of National Fitness Corps to administrative control of State Government proposal for such transfer of establishment of National Fitness Corps to administrative control of State Governments was made as far back as in actual transfer of services of respondent and other Instructors to that of State Government of Karnataka took place with effect from respondent became an employee of State Government – Held, Classification must be founded on an intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons or things that are grouped together from others who are left out of group difference must have a rational relation sought to be achieved – Test is clearly not fulfilled in case of Instructors Scheme – Distinction sought to be drawn by the learned Judges between two classes of Central Government employees those who work on Central Government activities and those who work on State Government activities, is without any rational basis and Instructors under Scheme could not be treated as a class distinct and separate – Such classification or differentiation of Instructors Scheme as a class of Central Government employees for depriving them of benefits in matters relating to employment which expression includes matters relating to salary, periodical increments, leave, gratuity pension age of superannuation – Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

ORDER— The short point involved in this Special Leave Petition directed against the judgment and order of the Karnataka High Court dated April 11, 1985 is whether the learned single Judge was right in issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the petitioners to extend the benefit of the revision of pay-scales from January 1, 1967 to January 1, 1973 upon the view that denial to the respondent R. G. Kashikar, who was an Instructor Grade II in the National Fitness Corps, of the benefit of revision of pay-scales as accorded to all other Central Government employees, was tantamount to denial of equality before law or equal protection of law and was thus violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution.

2. Facts giving rise to the Special Leave Petition are these. In 1954, the Government of India in the Ministry of Education introduced the National Discipline Scheme which, in the year 1965, came to be redesignated as the National Fitness Corps. The respondent was appointed as an Instructor Grade II under the National Discipline Scheme in the year 1963. While the respondent was continuing as an employee of the Central Government. a proposal was made for the transfer of Instructors of the National Fitness Corps to the administrative control of the State Governments. Though the proposal for such transfer of the establishment of the National Fitness Corps to the administrative control of the State Governments was made as far back as in the year 1965, the actual transfer of the services of the respondent and other Instructors to that of the State Government of Karnataka took place with effect from August 1, 1976. Accordingly, the respondent became an employee of the State Government from the said date, During this period, there were other revisions of pay-scales made in respect of employees of the Central Government, but the revision of pay-scales of Instructors on the establishment of the National Fitness Corps was not made by the Central Government. This was the third or the fourth occasion that the respondent knocked at the doors of the High Court for redressal of the wrong, The first writ petition filed by the respondent along with other Instructors in the National Fitness Corps allocated to the State of Karnataka, being Writ Petri. No. 3375 of 1975 was decided by Venkataramiah, J. by his judgment dated November 5, 1975. The teamed single Judge characterized the order passed by the Union of India, Ministry of Education & Social Welfare, Department of Education dated April 3, 1974 placing the services of the respondent and other Instructors at the disposal of the Director of Public Instructions, State of Karnataka as being one under Art. 258(1) of the Constitution, but declined to issue a writ of mandamus for extending to them the benefit of revision of pay-scales applicable to the Central Government employees on the ground that there was nothing to show that they had made a demand on the Central Government for extending to them the benefits such as revision of pay-scales, etc., which were extended to all other Central Government employees saying that it was open to them to make a representation to the Central Government in that behalf. In the meanwhile the respondent had already made a representation to the Central Government on October 17, 1975 requesting the Government of India to consider and extend revision of, pay-scales to the Instructors as accorded to all other Central Government servants and in particular to Teachers of the Central Schools as per recommendations of the Third Day Commission, complaining that Instructors under the National Fitness Corps was the only category of Central Government employees discriminated against.

3. Incidentally, the Third Pay Commission in its report stated :

"The Instructor of the National Discipline Scheme who had joined the National Fitness Corps are to be transferred to the State Governments. The emoluments of the Instructors are to be protected. The transfer is said to be in the pr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top