SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 11

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Surinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Engineer-in-chief, C. P. W. D – Respondent


Advocates:
BABY LAL, C.V.SUBBA RAO, K.K.GUPTA, L.K.GUPTA, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, R.D.AGRAWAL, V.C.MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :— In these two writ petitions, the petitioners who are. employed by the Central Public Works Department on a daily-wage basis and who have been so working for several years, demand that they should be paid the same wages as permanent employees employed to do identical work. They state that even if it is not possible to employ them on regular and permanent basis for want of a suitable number of posts, there is no reason whatsoever why they should be denied equal pay for equal work. In a similar petition filed by employees of the Nehru Yuvak Kendras, Civil Writ Petns. Nos. 4821 and 4817 of 1983, Dhirendra Chameli & Anr v. State of U.P., a Bench of this court consisting of Bhagwati, C.J. and Amarendra Nath Sen, J. issued the following directions :

"We, therefore, allow the writ petitions and make the rule absolute and direct the Central Government to accord to these persons, who are employed by the Nehru Yuvak Kendras and who are concededly performing the same duties as class IV employees, the same salary and conditions of service as are being received by class IV employees, except regularisation which cannot be done since there are no sanctioned posts. Bu





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top