SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 392

D.P.MADAN, G.L.OZA
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Panch Of Nani Hamams Pole – Respondent


Advocates:
C.V.SUBBA RAO, G.A.SHAH, GIRISH CHANDRA, H.J.Zaveri, R.N.Poddar

JUDGMENT

OZA, J.:— This appeal is by special leave granted by this Court against the judgment of Gujarat High Court at-Ahmedabad in Civil Second Appeal No. 45 of 1963.

2. Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 filed a suit No. 1476 of 1958 in the Court of Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ahmedabad for declaration that the proceedings and award in land acquisition case, No. L.A.Q. 1496 were illegal and for injunction restraining the defendants, the Panch of Nani Hamams Pole of Gujarat and the State of Gujarat from doing any act affecting the plaintiffs possession of Municipal Census Nos. 605 and 605/1 and Census Nos. 1335 to 1337 of Shahpur Ward II and the superstructure standing thereon situated in Nani Hamam, Ahmedabad.

3. These lands were acquired by acquisition proceedings under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. After Notifications under Sections 4 and 6, the acquisition proceedings proceeded further for determination of compensation and an award was made.

4. The grievance made by Plaintiff/ Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 was that no notice was given to them personally under Section 4 and Section 9(3) of the Land Acquisition Act and that they were not aware of the land acquisition proceedings till their















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top