SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 93

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, M.P.THAKKAR, G.L.OZA, P.N.BHAGWATI, S.NATARAJAN, V.KHALID
Sodhi Transport Company – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

E. S. VENKATARAMIAH, J.:- These appeals by special leave are filed against the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petri. No. 339 of 1981 and connected cases delivered on May 25, 1982 : (reported in 1983 Tax LR 2888) holding inter alia that S. 28-B of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 (U.P. Act No. XV of 1948) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and R. 87 of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Rules, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) framed by the Government of Uttar Pradesh in exercise of its powers conferred under the Act, as constitutionally valid and dismissing the Writ Petitions with costs. There are also before us a number of writ petitions presented under Art. 32 of the Constitution in which similar contentions are raised. We are disposing of all the appeals and the connected writ petitions by this common judgment. But we are setting out the facts in one set of appeals for purposes of all these cases as the questions involved are mostly legal issues.

2. The appellants who claim to be engaged in the business of transport of goods belonging to others for hire from one place to another and who in the course of their business have to carry g
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top